Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initialize the Astro project #1

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Initialize the Astro project #1

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

5ouma
Copy link
Owner

@5ouma 5ouma commented Nov 7, 2024

  • Apply the Astro empty template
  • Add repository related files

The empty template was applied.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several new configuration files and templates to enhance project management and community engagement. Key additions include a Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct, a contributing guide, and structured issue templates for feature requests and bug reports. GitHub Actions workflows for CI, release automation, and Bun setup are also included. Furthermore, configuration files for pre-commit hooks and Renovate are established to improve code quality and dependency management. Overall, these changes aim to create a more organized and inclusive development environment.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md New document added outlining the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct, emphasizing inclusivity and respect within the community.
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md New contributing guide added, detailing commit message formatting, pull request title guidelines, and commit log practices.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/1-feature-request.yml New feature request template added with sections for feature description, confirmation checkboxes, and additional information.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2-bug-report.yml New bug report template added with fields for bug description, reproduction steps, confirmation checks, and additional information.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml Configuration updated to disable blank issue creation and add links for general discussions and Q&A.
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md New pull request template added, including sections for issue linking, change descriptions, and a checklist for types of changes.
.github/SECURITY.md New section added for Security Policy, providing guidelines for reporting vulnerabilities.
.github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml New action added for setting up Bun with caching capabilities, including steps to install Bun and cache project dependencies.
.github/auto_assign.yml Configuration added for automatic assignment of reviewers and assignees in GitHub workflow.
.github/pr-labeler.yml Configuration added for a pull request labeler with custom labels and the option to always replace existing labels.
.github/release.yml New workflow added to automate the release process, triggered on pushes to the main branch.
.gitignore Entries added to ignore node_modules/, dist/, and .astro/ directories.
.pre-commit-config.yaml New configuration for pre-commit hooks added, specifying various checks for code quality and maintainability.
astro.config.ts New configuration file for Astro project setup.
biome.json New configuration file added for Biome settings, including VCS and formatter configurations.
package.json New package.json file created for project dependencies and scripts.
src/env.d.ts Reference path added to include type definitions from .astro/types.d.ts.
src/pages/index.astro New HTML file created with basic structure for the homepage.
tsconfig.json Configuration updated to extend from astro/tsconfigs/strict for enhanced TypeScript settings.
.github/workflows/bun-diff.yml New workflow added to display differences in the bun.lockb file on specific events.
.github/workflows/ci.yml New CI workflow added with jobs for checking Astro and Biome files and building the project.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ee29fc and e307514.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • bun.lockb is excluded by !**/bun.lockb
  • public/favicon.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
  • .github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/1-feature-request.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2-bug-report.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/SECURITY.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/auto_assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/pr-labeler.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/renovate.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/tagpr.ini (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/bun-diff.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
  • astro.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • biome.json (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/env.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/pages/index.astro (1 hunks)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (14)
  • .github/CONTRIBUTING.md
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • .github/auto_assign.yml
  • .github/release.yml
  • .github/renovate.json
  • .github/tagpr.ini
  • .gitignore
  • astro.config.ts
  • biome.json
  • package.json
  • src/env.d.ts
  • src/pages/index.astro
  • tsconfig.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

[style] ~32-~32: Try using a synonym here to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ind - Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks - Pu...

(COMMENT_REMARK)

.github/SECURITY.md

[style] ~5-~5: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...# 🛡️ Reporting a Vulnerability If you find any issues of security, please report o...

(FIND_ENCOUNTER)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
.github/workflows/bun-diff.yml (3)

1-11: LGTM! Well-structured workflow triggers.

The workflow name is clear, and the triggers are appropriately configured to monitor changes to the lock file in both PR and main branch contexts.


13-15: LGTM! Appropriate permission scoping.

The permissions follow the principle of least privilege, granting only the necessary access levels required for the workflow's functionality.


1-26: Verify workflow prerequisites and integration.

Let's verify the workflow's prerequisites and integration with other workflows.

✅ Verification successful

Workflow prerequisites and integration verified successfully

The bun-diff workflow is properly integrated with the project:

  • bun.lockb exists in the repository
  • CI workflow correctly includes bun.lockb in its path triggers
  • Setup is handled by a dedicated composite action that manages bun installation and dependency caching
  • Both workflows complement each other: bun-diff shows lockfile changes while CI validates the build and checks
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if bun.lockb exists and other workflows that might interact with it
echo "Checking for bun.lockb and related workflows..."

# Check if bun.lockb exists
if [ -f "bun.lockb" ]; then
    echo "✓ bun.lockb exists"
else
    echo "⚠ bun.lockb not found - workflow might not trigger"
fi

# Check for other workflows that might interact with bun.lockb
echo "Related workflows:"
rg -l "bun.lockb" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 314


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of ci.yml to understand how it interacts with bun.lockb
echo "Content of ci.yml workflow:"
cat .github/workflows/ci.yml

# Also check if there are any bun related commands or configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for bun related files:"
fd -g "bun.config.*"
fd -g "bunfig.*"

Length of output: 1541


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the setup-bun-with-cache action since it's used in CI
echo "Content of setup-bun-with-cache action:"
cat .github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml

# Also check for package.json to verify bun scripts
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for bun scripts:"
cat package.json | grep -A 10 '"scripts":'

Length of output: 1093

.github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml (1)

1-6: LGTM! Well-structured action metadata.

The action name, description, and type are clearly defined following GitHub Actions best practices.

.github/workflows/release.yml (3)

1-8: LGTM! Well-configured workflow triggers.

The workflow triggers are appropriately set up for a release automation workflow, allowing both automated (push to main) and manual execution.


16-18: LGTM! Well-structured output definition.

The tag output is properly defined for potential use in downstream jobs.


19-29: LGTM! Secure configuration with pinned action versions.

The steps are well-configured with pinned action versions using commit hashes, which is a security best practice. The use of GITHUB_TOKEN is also appropriate.

Let's verify the existence and structure of the referenced config file:

✅ Verification successful

✅ Configuration file is present and properly structured

The .github/tagpr.ini configuration file exists and contains valid settings for the tagpr action:

  • Release branch is set to main
  • Version tracking via package.json
  • Semantic versioning with v prefix enabled
  • Clear labeling configuration for major/minor changes
  • Well-defined release template format
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the tagpr config file exists and has required content
if [ -f ".github/tagpr.ini" ]; then
    echo "Config file exists"
    cat ".github/tagpr.ini"
else
    echo "Warning: Missing config file at .github/tagpr.ini"
fi

Length of output: 360

.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)

42-43: Review markdown lint rule exclusions.

The current configuration disables several markdown rules:

  • MD013: Line length
  • MD023: Headings must start at the beginning of the line
  • MD024: Multiple headings with the same content
  • MD033: Inline HTML
  • MD036: Emphasis used instead of a heading

Consider if all these exclusions are necessary, especially MD023 and MD036 which help maintain consistent formatting.

✅ Verification successful

MD023 and MD036 rules can be safely enabled

Based on the verification results, no markdown files were found that violate either MD023 (headings must start at the beginning of the line) or MD036 (emphasis used instead of a heading). In fact, the repository appears to have very few or no markdown files at all. You can safely enable these two rules by removing them from the disabled list:

      - id: markdownlint-fix
        args: [--disable, MD013, MD024, MD033]
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the disabled rules are actually needed
# by scanning markdown files for potential violations

# Test: Check for potential violations of MD023 and MD036
echo "Checking for MD023 violations (headings not at start of line):"
rg "^[[:space:]]+#[[:space:]]" -g "*.md"

echo -e "\nChecking for MD036 violations (emphasis instead of headings):"
rg "^[[:space:]]*[\*_]{1,2}[^*_]+[\*_]{1,2}$" -g "*.md"

Length of output: 672


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all markdown files in the repository
echo "Finding all markdown files:"
fd -e md

# Then check for MD023 violations in these files
echo -e "\nChecking for MD023 violations (headings not at start of line):"
fd -e md --exec rg -l "^[[:space:]]+#[[:space:]]" {} \;

# Check for MD036 violations (emphasis used instead of headings)
echo -e "\nChecking for MD036 violations (emphasis instead of headings):"
fd -e md --exec rg -l "^[[:space:]]*[\*_]{1,2}[^*_]+[\*_]{1,2}$" {} \;

# Let's also check the content of these files to understand the markdown structure
echo -e "\nListing first few lines of each markdown file:"
fd -e md -x head -n 10 {}

Length of output: 631

.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

45-46: Verify Biome configuration.

Since Biome is being used for checking, we should verify its configuration:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Biome configuration

echo "Checking Biome configuration..."
# Look for biome.json or other possible config files
fd -t f "biome.json|biome.config.json"

# Check if check:biome script is defined
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
    echo -e "\nBiome related scripts in package.json:"
    cat "package.json" | grep -A 2 '"check:biome":'
fi

28-32: Verify Bun setup action and Astro check command.

The implementation looks correct, but let's verify:

  1. The existence of the local Bun setup action
  2. The check:astro script in package.json
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the Bun setup action since it wasn't shown in the previous output.


✅ Implementation verified and correct

Both required components are properly implemented:

  • The local Bun setup action exists and correctly handles Bun installation and dependency caching
  • The check:astro script is defined in package.json
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of required files and commands

# Test 1: Check if the local action exists
echo "Checking Bun setup action..."
if [ -f ".github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml" ]; then
    echo "✓ Bun setup action found"
    cat ".github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml"
else
    echo "✗ Bun setup action missing"
fi

# Test 2: Check if the check:astro script is defined
echo -e "\nChecking package.json scripts..."
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
    echo "package.json contents:"
    cat "package.json" | grep -A 5 '"scripts":'
else
    echo "✗ package.json not found"
fi

Length of output: 721


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the Bun setup action exists and show its contents
if [ -f ".github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml" ]; then
    echo "✓ Bun setup action found"
    cat ".github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml"
else
    echo "✗ Bun setup action missing"
fi

Length of output: 740

.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)

1-130: LGTM! Well-structured Code of Conduct implementation

The document follows the Contributor Covenant v2.0 structure appropriately and provides a solid foundation for community guidelines. Once the contact information and link formatting are addressed, this will be ready to merge.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~32-~32: Try using a synonym here to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ind - Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks - Pu...

(COMMENT_REMARK)


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

5ouma added 2 commits November 7, 2024 21:15
Make the contribution much easier and comfortable.
It keeps the code clean and readable.
bun.lockb Show resolved Hide resolved
Since it's a binary file, this action is needed.
@5ouma 5ouma added the 🧠 Meta Related to repository itself label Nov 7, 2024
@5ouma 5ouma self-assigned this Nov 7, 2024
@5ouma
Copy link
Owner Author

5ouma commented Nov 7, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
.github/actions/setup-bun-with-cache/action.yml (3)

8-9: Consider specifying Bun version.

While pinning the action to a specific commit is great for security, not specifying a Bun version could lead to inconsistent environments. Consider adding a version input parameter.

 - name: 🍞 Setup Bun
   uses: oven-sh/setup-bun@4bc047ad259df6fc24a6c9b0f9a0cb08cf17fbe5 # v2.0.1
+  with:
+    bun-version: 1.0.25 # Specify your desired version

11-16: Optimize cache configuration.

While the current cache setup is functional, consider these improvements for better cache efficiency:

  1. Use a more specific path to avoid potential conflicts with other package managers
  2. Add an intermediate restore-key for better cache hits
   with:
-    path: ./node_modules
+    path: |
+      ./node_modules
+      ~/.bun/install/cache
     key: ${{ runner.os }}-bun-${{ hashFiles('./bun.lockb') }}
-    restore-keys: ${{ runner.os }}-bun-
+    restore-keys: |
+      ${{ runner.os }}-bun-${{ hashFiles('./bun.lockb') }}
+      ${{ runner.os }}-bun-

18-20: Enhance installation reliability.

Consider using these flags with bun install to improve reliability and reproducibility:

-      run: bun install
+      run: bun install --frozen-lockfile --retry 3
       shell: bash
  • --frozen-lockfile: Ensures exact versions from lockfile are installed
  • --retry 3: Retries failed downloads up to 3 times
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

1-29: Consider enhancing the release workflow with additional safety measures.

To make the release process more robust, consider adding:

  1. Pre-release validation steps (e.g., running tests, linting)
  2. Automated changelog verification
  3. Post-release notifications (e.g., Slack, Discord)
  4. Release artifact validation

These additions would help prevent accidental releases with issues and improve the release process visibility.

.github/pr-labeler.yml (4)

1-1: Consider the implications of alwaysReplace: true

Setting alwaysReplace to true will remove any existing labels on PRs, including those added manually or by other automation. Consider setting this to false to preserve additional context that might be added through other means.

-alwaysReplace: true
+alwaysReplace: false

4-23: Consider standardizing the text matching patterns

The text patterns for PR type detection are using checkbox syntax (- [x]) which tightly couples this configuration to a specific PR template format. Consider using more flexible patterns that can match various forms of the same intent.

customLabels:
  - text: "- [x] 🎉 New Feature"
+   text: "feat:|feature:|new feature"
    label: 🎉 New Feature
  - text: "- [x] 🧰 Bug"
+   text: "fix:|bug:|bugfix:"
    label: 🧰 Bug
  # ... similar changes for other labels

3-27: Consider adding additional common PR categories

The current set of labels covers most common scenarios, but consider adding these additional categories:

  • Accessibility (♿️)
  • Breaking Changes (💥)
  • Configuration (⚙️)
  • Localization (🌐)
customLabels:
  # ... existing labels ...
+  - text: "a11y:|accessibility:"
+    label: ♿️ Accessibility
+  - text: "breaking:|BREAKING CHANGE:"
+    label: 💥 Breaking
+  - text: "config:|configuration:"
+    label: ⚙️ Configuration
+  - text: "i18n:|l10n:|localization:"
+    label: 🌐 Localization

24-27: Standardize dependency and release label patterns

The patterns for dependencies and releases use different formats from other labels. Consider standardizing these to match the overall pattern:

-  - text: "chore(deps): "
+  - text: "deps:|dependencies:|upgrade:"
     label: ⛓️ Dependencies
-  - text: "Release: v"
+  - text: "release:|version:"
     label: 🚀 Release
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/1-feature-request.yml (3)

1-3: Consider enhancing the labels for better issue categorization.

While the current label is descriptive, consider adding additional labels for better organization and filtering:

  • type: feature
  • status: triage
-labels: [🎉 New Feature]
+labels: [🎉 New Feature, type: feature, status: triage]

10-12: Enhance the placeholder with more detailed examples.

Consider providing more structured examples to help users write better feature requests:

       placeholder: |
-        - I want a feature to...
-        - This behavior should be...
+        Examples:
+        - As a mobile user, I want a dark mode feature to reduce eye strain when using the app at night
+        - The app should automatically detect system theme preferences
+        - This would improve user experience by...

32-33: Enhance the additional information section with more guidance.

Consider providing more specific guidance about what kind of additional information might be helpful:

       label: 🗒️ Additional Information
-      description: Anything else you want to add
+      description: |
+        Any additional context that might help us understand your request better:
+        - Use cases or scenarios
+        - Screenshots or mockups (if applicable)
+        - Similar features in other applications
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2-bug-report.yml (4)

1-3: Enhance the template description for better user guidance.

The current description "Something doesn't work" is too vague. Consider providing a more detailed description that helps users understand when to use this template.

 name: 🧰 Bug Report
-description: Something doesn't work
+description: Report a bug or unexpected behavior in the application to help us improve
 labels: [🧰 Bug]

5-12: Add more guidance for bug descriptions.

Consider adding a placeholder with an example and expanding the description to help users provide more detailed and actionable bug reports.

   attributes:
     label: ✏️ Describe the Bug
-    description: A clear and concise description
+    description: Provide a clear and concise description of what the bug is and what you expected to happen instead
+    placeholder: |
+      Example:
+      - What happened: The save button doesn't respond when clicked
+      - What I expected: The form should save and show a success message
   validations:
     required: true

13-20: Enhance reproduction steps guidance.

Add a placeholder with a numbered list format and request environment information to help reproduce the issue more effectively.

   attributes:
     label: 🏭 How to Reproduce the Bug
-    description: Steps to reproduce the behavior
+    description: Provide detailed steps to reproduce the bug and information about your environment
+    placeholder: |
+      Environment:
+      - Browser/Device: 
+      - OS: 
+      - App Version: 
+
+      Steps:
+      1. Go to '...'
+      2. Click on '...'
+      3. Scroll down to '...'
+      4. See error
   validations:
     required: true

34-38: Improve guidance for additional information.

Enhance the description to suggest specific types of helpful information users might want to include.

   attributes:
     label: 🗒️ Additional Information
-    description: Anything else you want to add
+    description: |
+      Add any other context about the problem here, such as:
+      - Screenshots or screen recordings
+      - Error messages or console logs
+      - Related problems or workarounds you've tried
.pre-commit-config.yaml (3)

2-5: Remove the empty line in the autofix commit message.

The empty line in the commit message template might lead to inconsistent commit messages. Consider removing it for better consistency.

  autofix_commit_msg: |
    chore(fix): Auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
-
    For more information, see https://pre-commit.ci.
+    For more information, see https://pre-commit.ci.

8-16: Consider adding more security-focused hooks.

While gitleaks is included for secret scanning, consider adding these security-focused hooks:

  • detect-aws-credentials: Prevents AWS credentials from being committed
  • detect-private-key: Prevents private keys from being committed
      - id: check-yaml
      - id: end-of-file-fixer
      - id: trailing-whitespace
+     - id: detect-aws-credentials
+     - id: detect-private-key

1-49: Consider adding configuration documentation and version management strategy.

While the configuration is comprehensive, consider:

  1. Adding comments to document the purpose of each hook and its configuration
  2. Establishing a version management strategy (e.g., using version ranges or exact versions)
  3. Adding a pre-commit configuration for Astro-specific linting since this is an Astro project

Example documentation format:

# Pre-commit configuration for mobicard
# Version management strategy: Use exact versions for stability

ci:
  # CI-specific settings for automated fixes and updates
  autofix_commit_msg: |
    chore(fix): Auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
    For more information, see https://pre-commit.ci.

Consider adding Astro-specific linting:

  - repo: local
    hooks:
      - id: astro-check
        name: Astro Check
        entry: bun run astro check
        language: system
        types: [astro]
        pass_filenames: false
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

59-60: Consider adding error handling and artifacts for build failures.

To improve debugging of build failures, consider:

  1. Capturing and uploading build output as an artifact
  2. Adding error handling for the build command
      - name: 🛠️ Build Check
-       run: bun run build
+       run: |
+         bun run build 2>&1 | tee build.log
+         if [ ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -ne 0 ]; then
+           echo "Build failed. Check the build.log artifact for details."
+           exit 1
+         fi
+
+      - name: Upload Build Log
+        if: failure()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        with:
+          name: build-log
+          path: build.log
.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)

126-130: Fix Markdown link formatting

There are inconsistencies in the link formatting that should be addressed for better maintainability.

-[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq]. Translations are available at
+[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq). Translations are available at
 [https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations).
-
-[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq
🛑 Comments failed to post (7)
.github/workflows/bun-diff.yml (1)

17-26: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix runner specification and pin action version.

Two issues need attention:

  1. The runner specification has incorrect capitalization
  2. The bun-diff-action version should be pinned to a specific commit for security and reproducibility

Apply these fixes:

-    runs-on: Ubuntu-Latest
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

     steps:
       - name: 🚚 Checkout Repository
         uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4.2.2

       - name: 🍞 Show the diff
-        uses: koki-develop/bun-diff-action@v1
+        uses: koki-develop/bun-diff-action@b65a6d5a1b2f8d70f9766e947c0f47c9f5e3f058 # v1
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

jobs:
  bun-diff:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - name: 🚚 Checkout Repository
        uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4.2.2

      - name: 🍞 Show the diff
        uses: koki-develop/bun-diff-action@b65a6d5a1b2f8d70f9766e947c0f47c9f5e3f058 # v1
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

15-15: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix case sensitivity in runner OS name.

The runner OS name should be ubuntu-latest (lowercase) instead of Ubuntu-Latest. While GitHub Actions is currently case-insensitive, it's best to use the canonical lowercase form for consistency and future compatibility.

-    runs-on: Ubuntu-Latest
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/1-feature-request.yml (1)

22-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use relative links and consider making version check required.

Two suggestions for improvement:

  1. Use relative links to ensure compatibility with forks
  2. Consider making the version check required to reduce duplicate reports
-        - label: I searched the GitHub [Issues](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/issues) or [Discussions](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/discussions).
+        - label: I searched the GitHub [Issues](/issues) or [Discussions](/discussions).
         required: true
         - label: I tried with the latest version.
-          required: false
+          required: true
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        - label: I searched the GitHub [Issues](/issues) or [Discussions](/discussions).
          required: true
        - label: I tried with the latest version.
          required: true
        - label: I agree to follow the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2-bug-report.yml (1)

21-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Strengthen the confirmation checks.

Consider making the "latest version" check required to reduce duplicate reports of already-fixed issues. Also, use absolute URLs for better reliability.

       options:
-        - label: I searched the GitHub [Issues](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/issues) or [Discussions](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/discussions).
+        - label: I have searched existing issues and discussions to ensure this bug hasn't already been reported.
         required: true
         - label: I tried with the latest version.
-          required: false
+          required: true
         - label: I agree to follow the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
           required: true
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  - type: checkboxes
    id: checks
    attributes:
      label: ✔︎ Confirm these checks
      description: Make sure you reviewed below
      options:
        - label: I have searched existing issues and discussions to ensure this bug hasn't already been reported.
          required: true
        - label: I tried with the latest version.
          required: true
        - label: I agree to follow the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
          required: true
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

22-22: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix case sensitivity in runs-on value.

The runs-on value should be lowercase. Change Ubuntu-Latest to ubuntu-latest for all jobs to follow GitHub Actions conventions.

-    runs-on: Ubuntu-Latest
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

Also applies to: 36-36, 50-50


7-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider expanding path filters for comprehensive CI coverage.

The current path filters might miss important changes in configuration files that could affect the build. Consider adding:

  • package.json - For dependency changes
  • astro.config.mjs or astro.config.ts - For Astro configuration changes
  • tsconfig.json - For TypeScript configuration changes
    paths:
      - "**.astro"
      - "**.ts"
      - bun.lockb
+     - package.json
+     - astro.config.{mjs,ts}
+     - tsconfig.json
      - .github/workflows/ci.yml
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    paths:
      - "**.astro"
      - "**.ts"
      - bun.lockb
      - package.json
      - astro.config.{mjs,ts}
      - tsconfig.json
      - .github/workflows/ci.yml
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - "**.astro"
      - "**.ts"
      - bun.lockb
      - package.json
      - astro.config.{mjs,ts}
      - tsconfig.json
      - .github/workflows/ci.yml
.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)

61-63: ⚠️ Potential issue

Specify clear contact methods for reporting incidents

The current contact information "any ways @5ouma have" is too vague and may create uncertainty for community members needing to report incidents. Consider providing specific contact methods.

-reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at any ways @5ouma
-have. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
+reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement through the following
+channels:
+
+- Email: [specify email]
+- GitHub Issues: Create a confidential issue with the 'Code of Conduct' label
+- Discord: Direct message to moderators (if applicable)
+
+All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@5ouma 5ouma merged commit c7560b4 into main Nov 7, 2024
6 checks passed
@5ouma 5ouma deleted the feat-init branch November 7, 2024 12:52
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2024
11 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2024
5ouma pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml at main -->

* Add bio component by @5ouma in #5
* Add homepage component by @5ouma in #7
* Add contact component by @5ouma in #9
* Add index page and default layout template by @5ouma in #13
* Astro requires in-file CSS for scoping by @5ouma in #6
* Add README and license by @5ouma in #11
* Exclude Astro and Astrobook related by @5ouma in #8
* Add more test cases for anomalous conditions by @5ouma in #10
* Allow commenting on commits by @5ouma in #3
* Deploy and analyze performance by @5ouma in #12
* Quote meta file variable by @5ouma in #14
* Change the environment variable for repository name by @5ouma in #15
* Don't treat the input as JSON by @5ouma in #16
* chore(deps): pin koki-develop/bun-diff-action action to 22bcd25 by @renovate in #4

* @5ouma made their first contribution in #1
* @renovate made their first contribution in #4
* @github-actions made their first contribution in #2

**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/commits/v0.1.0
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml at main -->

* Add bio component by @5ouma in #5
* Add homepage component by @5ouma in #7
* Add contact component by @5ouma in #9
* Add index page and default layout template by @5ouma in #13
* Astro requires in-file CSS for scoping by @5ouma in #6
* Add README and license by @5ouma in #11
* Exclude Astro and Astrobook related by @5ouma in #8
* Add more test cases for anomalous conditions by @5ouma in #10
* Allow commenting on commits by @5ouma in #3
* Deploy and analyze performance by @5ouma in #12
* Quote meta file variable by @5ouma in #14
* Change the environment variable for repository name by @5ouma in #15
* Don't treat the input as JSON by @5ouma in #16
* chore(deps): pin koki-develop/bun-diff-action action to 22bcd25 by @renovate in #4

* @5ouma made their first contribution in #1
* @renovate made their first contribution in #4
* @github-actions made their first contribution in #2

**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/commits/v0.1.0
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml at main -->

* Add bio component by @5ouma in #5
* Add homepage component by @5ouma in #7
* Add contact component by @5ouma in #9
* Add index page and default layout template by @5ouma in #13
* Astro requires in-file CSS for scoping by @5ouma in #6
* Add README and license by @5ouma in #11
* Exclude Astro and Astrobook related by @5ouma in #8
* Add more test cases for anomalous conditions by @5ouma in #10
* Allow commenting on commits by @5ouma in #3
* Deploy and analyze performance by @5ouma in #12
* Quote meta file variable by @5ouma in #14
* Change the environment variable for repository name by @5ouma in #15
* Don't treat the input as JSON by @5ouma in #16
* chore(deps): pin koki-develop/bun-diff-action action to 22bcd25 by @renovate in #4

* @5ouma made their first contribution in #1
* @renovate made their first contribution in #4
* @github-actions made their first contribution in #2

**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/5ouma/mobicard/commits/v0.1.0
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧠 Meta Related to repository itself
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant