Exclude Astro and Astrobook related

[5ouma]

⚠️ Issue

close #

✏️ Description

They don't need to be tested.

🔄 Type of the Change

• 🎉 New Feature
• 🧰 Bug
• 🛡️ Security
• 📖 Documentation
• 🏎️ Performance
• 🧹 Refactoring
• 🧪 Testing
• 🔧 Maintenance
• 🎽 CI
• 🧠 Meta

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bc4ab6e) to head (3dab4d3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             main        #8       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage   60.86%   100.00%   +39.13%     
============================================
  Files           9         5        -4     
  Lines          69        42       -27     
  Branches        8         4        -4     
============================================
  Hits           42        42               
+ Misses         23         0       -23     
+ Partials        4         0        -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the vitest.config.ts file. A new import statement for coverageConfigDefaults is introduced, and the configuration object for getViteConfig is updated to include a coverage property. This property contains an exclude array that specifies certain files and directories to be excluded from coverage reporting, including specific configuration and layout files, as well as story files.

Changes

File	Change Summary
vitest.config.ts	Added import for coverageConfigDefaults and modified the getViteConfig configuration to include a coverage property with an exclude array for specific files and directories.

Warning

Tool Failures:

Tool Failure Count:

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

vitest.config.ts (1)

10-18: Document the rationale for coverage exclusions

While the configuration is technically correct, it would be helpful to add comments explaining why these specific paths and patterns are being excluded from coverage reporting. This documentation will help future maintainers understand the decisions made.

     coverage: {
+      // Exclude Astro configuration as it's framework code
+      // Exclude pages and layouts as they're Astro-specific components
+      // Exclude story files as they're for documentation purposes
       exclude: [
         "astro.config.ts",
         "src/pages/",
         "src/layouts/",
         "**/*.stories.ts",
         ...coverageConfigDefaults.exclude,
       ],
     },

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc4ab6e and 3dab4d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• vitest.config.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

vitest.config.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM: Import statement is correct

The import of coverageConfigDefaults is properly added and will help maintain Vitest's default coverage exclusions.

---

11-17: Consider more granular exclusion patterns

The current configuration excludes entire directories (src/pages/ and src/layouts/). Consider if there are specific files or patterns within these directories that should be tested. A more targeted approach might be beneficial for maintaining good test coverage.

Let's check what files might be affected:

Consider excluding specific file patterns instead of entire directories if there are testable components within these directories.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the content of these files and any potential test files to make a more informed decision.

---

Current exclusion patterns are appropriate

The current exclusion patterns in the test configuration are justified because:

• src/pages/ only contains a basic Astro page template (index.astro) with no testable logic
• src/layouts/ directory doesn't exist in the codebase
• Story files (.stories.ts) are correctly excluded as they are Storybook files, not test files
• The actual testable components have their corresponding test files (Bio.test.ts, Homepage.test.ts) and are not affected by these exclusions

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check what files exist in the excluded directories
echo "Files in src/pages/:"
fd . "src/pages" -t f

echo -e "\nFiles in src/layouts/:"
fd . "src/layouts" -t f

echo -e "\nStory files that will be excluded:"
fd -g "*.stories.ts"

Length of output: 464

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of index.astro and look for any testable components
echo "Content of src/pages/index.astro:"
cat src/pages/index.astro

# Check if there are any test files in the project
echo -e "\nExisting test files:"
fd -g "*test*" -t f

# Check if there are any components imported in index.astro
echo -e "\nComponent imports in index.astro:"
rg "import.*from.*components" src/pages/index.astro

Length of output: 734