This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
#790 Part2: adding Fusion based subtyping for LGAT #843
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kgaonkar6
changed the title
Lgat add subtyping fus
adding Fusion based subtyping for LGAT
Nov 16, 2020
8 tasks
kgaonkar6
changed the title
adding Fusion based subtyping for LGAT
#790 Part2: adding Fusion based subtyping for LGAT
Nov 18, 2020
8 tasks
Co-authored-by: Jo Lynne Rokita <jharenza@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jo Lynne Rokita <jharenza@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jo Lynne Rokita <jharenza@gmail.com>
…/OpenPBTA-analysis into lgat_add_subtyping_Fus
Closing this because unwanted tp53-classifier-score files got added to this PR |
This was referenced Nov 20, 2020
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose/implementation Section
LGAT subtyping is being revamped as per issue. I'm diving into this with staggered PRs per alteration as:
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
As per issue we will be subtyping LGAT based on fusion in the following genes:
LGG, KIAA1549-BRAF
contains KIAA1549-BRAF fusion
LGG, other MAPK
contains non-canonical BRAF fusion other than KIAA1549-BRAF
contains RAF1 fusion
LGG, RTK
harbors a fusion in ALK, ROS1, NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 or
harbors a PDGFRA fusion
LGG, FGFR
harbors FGFR1-TACC1 fusion
harbors FGFR1 or FGFR2 fusions
LGG, MYB/MYBL1
harbors either a MYB-QKI fusion or other MYB or MYBL1 fusion
What was your approach?
The fusion status per subtype is saved as lgat-subset/LGAT_fusion_subset.tsv
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
#790
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
We will have to review/push through #842 since SNV subtyping was done in the previous PR.
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Yes
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
lgat-subset/LGAT_fusion_subset.tsv
What is your summary of the results?
122 biospecimens have canonical KIAA1549--BRAF, 12 biospecimens have fusion in other MAPK genes, 14 biospecimen have fusions in RTK genes, 3 biospecimens have MYB fusion.
There are no FGFR1--TACC1 or FGFR fusion in the lgat biospecimen list.
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.