-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pedersen cleanup #3029
Comments
We also have c_bind and c_bind_new -- since the generator runs on c_bind_new, we can get rid of c_bind and parties which rely on c_bind should switch to that calling convention |
General investigation of hash/commit methods which are not used |
We have a pattern of exposing hash methods which can be implemented by other exposed hash methods. One example is plookupCompress and PlookupCompressWithHashIndex, where the former is the latter with an index of 0 #3038 wittles down the interface to only have HashWithHashIndex and Hash |
This can be a separate issue. Investigate implementation of hash_buffer:
Intuitively, I would have expected it to convert a buffer into fields, then call EDIT: this was is actually better because we re-use the same generators, instead of having N different generators |
check for stale comments/TODOs in some of the pedersen files, the most obvious would be to grep for |
Investigate whether we should get rid of |
Related to #3029 We can merge this into `kw/pedersen-cleanup-remove-unused-cbinds` as part of the cleanup # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
Related to #3029 This removes all of the unused c_binds. The typescript code has been modified to not use any of these, so at this point its not a breaking change for yarn-packages. The bb.js codegen were using these inside of tests that I added to make sure that they were computing the same thing, these tests have been removed. # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). --------- Co-authored-by: Leila Wang <leizciw@gmail.com>
…an Fr element (#3072) Commit history was a bit messed up in #3071 Related to #3029 # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
This method is no longer being used, we can bring it back if it is deemed necessary. Related to #3029 # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
…and ts (#3074) This removes all mention of the phrase compress in relation to pedersen, execpt for one place because the code has been commented out. I think we should likely delete that file and re-add tests. File is `barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/stdlib/commitment/pedersen/pedersen.test.cpp` Related to #3029 # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
When we merged the mega PR, we commented out the stdlib pedersen commitment code. This was okay for the most part because we had tests for pedersen hashing tests. This adds back smoke pedersen commitment tests. Also happy to just remove the file, if folks want. Related to #3029 # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
Related to #3029 and resolves #3077 . The generator context is initializing and extending generator data which outlives the lifetime of the function (it stays alive for the lifetime of wasm instance). There may be an argument in the future to add a method that will arbitrarily extend the generators, so that they do not get extended in the middle of a pedersen call, if this is wanted we can open up a separate issue. # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
Problem
Now that Pedersen has been merged, the codebase is a lot cleaner however we still have a bit of tech debt related to the old pedersen implementations.
This is a tracking issue to note down all of these tech debt tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: