Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Goblin proof construction #3332

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023
Merged

feat: Goblin proof construction #3332

merged 42 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

codygunton
Copy link
Contributor

@codygunton codygunton commented Nov 16, 2023

The last PR that splits out and completes work from #3022

We add composer, prover and verifier classes for the Goblin Translator VM. We also further flesh out the full Goblin composer tests. Modulo some missing challenge generation, we have our first Goblin proofs (i.e., something worth measuring)!

Spawned issues
AztecProtocol/barretenberg#783
AztecProtocol/barretenberg#784
AztecProtocol/barretenberg#785
AztecProtocol/barretenberg#786
AztecProtocol/barretenberg#787

Checklist:

Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge.

  • If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag.
  • I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code.
  • Every change is related to the PR description.
  • I have linked this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).

@codygunton codygunton self-assigned this Nov 16, 2023
@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

AztecBot commented Nov 16, 2023

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

  • note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (8): 100 (+433%)
  • note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (32): 88.8 (+555%)
Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit 5cfbb68b and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric 8 txs 32 txs 128 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes 45,444 179,588 716,132
l1_rollup_calldata_gas 222,900 868,160 3,449,516
l1_rollup_execution_gas 841,987 3,595,268 22,204,885
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms 2,005 (-1%) 7,710 (-1%) 29,908 (-1%)
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 297 (-6%) 878 (-3%) 3,243 (-1%)
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms ⚠️ 100 (+433%) ⚠️ 88.8 (+555%) 142 (+1%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms 20,747 (-2%) 81,839 (-2%) 326,577 (-1%)
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms 12,088 (-2%) 47,435 (-2%) 188,619 (-1%)
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms 8,617 (-2%) 34,263 (-2%) 137,442 (-1%)

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric 5 blocks 10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms 22,044 (-1%) 42,811 (-1%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 2,038 (-4%) 4,042 (-2%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 125 (-2%) 158 (+1%)
node_database_size_in_bytes 1,629,370 1,099,814
pxe_database_size_in_bytes 29,748 59,307

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit circuit_simulation_time_in_ms circuit_input_size_in_bytes circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init 774 61,697 18,905
private-kernel-ordering 128 24,297 8,153
base-rollup 1,753 (-1%) 656,428 873
root-rollup 169 (-1%) 4,072 1,097
private-kernel-inner 799 81,568 18,905
public-kernel-private-input 574 41,519 18,905
public-kernel-non-first-iteration 411 41,561 18,905
merge-rollup 15.4 (-1%) 2,592 873

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.

Metric 0 deployed contracts 1 deployed contracts
tx_size_in_bytes 8,787 27,547

@codygunton codygunton changed the base branch from master to lde/eccvm_univariate_openings November 17, 2023 17:59
Base automatically changed from lde/eccvm_univariate_openings to master November 17, 2023 19:24
@codygunton codygunton changed the base branch from master to cg-lde/zm_updates November 17, 2023 21:45
Base automatically changed from cg-lde/zm_updates to master November 17, 2023 21:46
}
}

// TODO(https://github.com/AztecProtocol/barretenberg/issues/787) Expand these tests.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a note to add more tests once we have a properly encapsulated Goblin. Will make it easier to write the tests, and this test wasn't doing anything Goblin-specific.


ECCVMCircuitBuilder(std::vector<VMOperation> vm_operations)
: vm_operations(vm_operations){};
ECCVMCircuitBuilder(std::shared_ptr<ECCOpQueue>& op_queue)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without this, the shared pointer initializes to null.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How did it work before? Was this API actually never used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A pointer wasn't passed, there was just a vector of operations, but now we need to pass in this op_queue to share data between the ECCVM and the Translator.

BF evaluation_input_x = 0;
BF batching_challenge_v = 0;
std::shared_ptr<VerificationKey> key;
std::map<std::string, Commitment> commitments;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Idk why we're using maps here, but I see they're also in use in the other flavors. Will leave an issue

@codygunton codygunton requested a review from Rumata888 November 21, 2023 19:19
@codygunton codygunton marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2023 20:56
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ template <typename Flavor> bool ECCVMVerifier_<Flavor>::verify_proof(const plonk
univariate_opening_verified = PCS::verify(pcs_verification_key, batched_univariate_claim, transcript);
}

return multivariate_opening_verified && univariate_opening_verified;
return sumcheck_verified.value() && multivariate_opening_verified && univariate_opening_verified;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haven't we already verified the sumcheck by this time?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah but it felt safer to add this check (why not? also what if somehow the option doesn't have a value and the early return is missed? not sure what happens then).


namespace {
auto& engine = numeric::random::get_debug_engine();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we not use debug engine for reproducible randomness anymore?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@codygunton codygunton Nov 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think randomness by default in tests is better. More chances to discover weird edge cases! You said you agree.

#include "barretenberg/ecc/curves/bn254/fq.hpp"

namespace barretenberg {
struct TranslationEvaluations {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this should be in the EccOpQueue? It seems natural to have it there, since it has no goblin translator specific members.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But then OpQueue is not a good name...

}

/**
* @brief Compute permutation and lookup grand product polynomials and commitments
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No lookup grand product

* @tparam Flavor provides the circuit constructor type and the number of wires.
* @param circuit_builder
* @param dyadic_circuit_size Power of 2 circuit size
* @todo TODO(https://github.com/AztecProtocol/barretenberg/issues/783) Optimize memory operatations.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

operatations

@codygunton codygunton enabled auto-merge (squash) November 22, 2023 19:32
@codygunton codygunton disabled auto-merge November 22, 2023 19:32
@codygunton codygunton enabled auto-merge (squash) November 22, 2023 19:32
@codygunton codygunton merged commit 6a7ebb6 into master Nov 22, 2023
76 checks passed
@codygunton codygunton deleted the cg/full-goblin branch November 22, 2023 20:04
kevaundray pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.16.0</summary>

##
[0.16.0](aztec-packages-v0.15.1...aztec-packages-v0.16.0)
(2023-11-27)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* deprecate circuits/cpp
([#3421](#3421))
* call stack validation optimisation.
([#3387](#3387))

### Features

* Base rollup in noir
([#3257](#3257))
([4a1e9c3](4a1e9c3))
* Call stack validation optimisation.
([#3387](#3387))
([d06d5db](d06d5db))
* Goblin proof construction
([#3332](#3332))
([6a7ebb6](6a7ebb6))
* More logs relevant for debugging failures of 2 pixies test
([#3370](#3370))
([683a0f3](683a0f3))
* Noir subrepo.
([#3369](#3369))
([d94d88b](d94d88b))
* Noir_wasm compilation of noir programs
([#3272](#3272))
([f9981d5](f9981d5))
* Rollback public state changes on failure
([#3393](#3393))
([0e276fb](0e276fb))


### Bug Fixes

* **docs:** Doc explaining noir debug_log
([#3322](#3322))
([eed023d](eed023d))
* Naming inconsistency in private kernel
([#3384](#3384))
([4743486](4743486))
* Race condition in `PXE.getTxReceipt(...)`
([#3411](#3411))
([9557a66](9557a66))


### Miscellaneous

* Deprecate circuits/cpp
([#3421](#3421))
([4973cfb](4973cfb))
* Deterministically deduplicate
`cached_partial_non_native_field_multiplication` across wasm32 and
native compilations
([#3425](#3425))
([5524933](5524933))
* **docs:** Common patterns and anti patterns in aztec.nr
([#3413](#3413))
([65bd855](65bd855))
* Fix and reenable e2e quick start
([#3403](#3403))
([112740e](112740e)),
closes
[#3356](#3356)
* Fix intermittent failures for block-building e2e test
([#3404](#3404))
([e76e2d4](e76e2d4)),
closes
[#3358](#3358)
* Formatted `noir-contracts` and `aztec-nr`
([a73c4aa](a73c4aa))
* Initial clone of noir to subrepo
([#3409](#3409))
([8f1cb83](8f1cb83))
* **noir-contracts:** Remove redundant return value of 1
([#3415](#3415))
([2001d47](2001d47)),
closes
[#2615](#2615)
* Plumbs noir subrepo into yarn-project.
([#3420](#3420))
([63173c4](63173c4))
* Remove pxe / node /p2p-bootstrap docker images
([#3396](#3396))
([c236143](c236143))
* Skip artifacts for prettier
([#3399](#3399))
([98d9e04](98d9e04))
* Update path to acir artifacts
([#3426](#3426))
([f56f88d](f56f88d))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.16.0</summary>

##
[0.16.0](barretenberg.js-v0.15.1...barretenberg.js-v0.16.0)
(2023-11-27)


### Miscellaneous

* Plumbs noir subrepo into yarn-project.
([#3420](#3420))
([63173c4](63173c4))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.16.0</summary>

##
[0.16.0](barretenberg-v0.15.1...barretenberg-v0.16.0)
(2023-11-27)


### Features

* Goblin proof construction
([#3332](#3332))
([6a7ebb6](6a7ebb6))
* Noir subrepo.
([#3369](#3369))
([d94d88b](d94d88b))


### Miscellaneous

* Deterministically deduplicate
`cached_partial_non_native_field_multiplication` across wasm32 and
native compilations
([#3425](#3425))
([5524933](5524933))
* Plumbs noir subrepo into yarn-project.
([#3420](#3420))
([63173c4](63173c4))
* Update path to acir artifacts
([#3426](#3426))
([f56f88d](f56f88d))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
AztecBot added a commit to AztecProtocol/barretenberg that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.16.0</summary>

##
[0.16.0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.15.1...aztec-packages-v0.16.0)
(2023-11-27)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* deprecate circuits/cpp
([#3421](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3421))
* call stack validation optimisation.
([#3387](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3387))

### Features

* Base rollup in noir
([#3257](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3257))
([4a1e9c3](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4a1e9c3))
* Call stack validation optimisation.
([#3387](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3387))
([d06d5db](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@d06d5db))
* Goblin proof construction
([#3332](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3332))
([6a7ebb6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6a7ebb6))
* More logs relevant for debugging failures of 2 pixies test
([#3370](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3370))
([683a0f3](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@683a0f3))
* Noir subrepo.
([#3369](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3369))
([d94d88b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@d94d88b))
* Noir_wasm compilation of noir programs
([#3272](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3272))
([f9981d5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f9981d5))
* Rollback public state changes on failure
([#3393](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3393))
([0e276fb](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e276fb))


### Bug Fixes

* **docs:** Doc explaining noir debug_log
([#3322](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3322))
([eed023d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@eed023d))
* Naming inconsistency in private kernel
([#3384](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3384))
([4743486](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4743486))
* Race condition in `PXE.getTxReceipt(...)`
([#3411](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3411))
([9557a66](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@9557a66))


### Miscellaneous

* Deprecate circuits/cpp
([#3421](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3421))
([4973cfb](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4973cfb))
* Deterministically deduplicate
`cached_partial_non_native_field_multiplication` across wasm32 and
native compilations
([#3425](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3425))
([5524933](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5524933))
* **docs:** Common patterns and anti patterns in aztec.nr
([#3413](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3413))
([65bd855](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@65bd855))
* Fix and reenable e2e quick start
([#3403](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3403))
([112740e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@112740e)),
closes
[#3356](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3356)
* Fix intermittent failures for block-building e2e test
([#3404](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3404))
([e76e2d4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@e76e2d4)),
closes
[#3358](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3358)
* Formatted `noir-contracts` and `aztec-nr`
([a73c4aa](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a73c4aa))
* Initial clone of noir to subrepo
([#3409](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3409))
([8f1cb83](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@8f1cb83))
* **noir-contracts:** Remove redundant return value of 1
([#3415](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3415))
([2001d47](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@2001d47)),
closes
[#2615](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2615)
* Plumbs noir subrepo into yarn-project.
([#3420](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3420))
([63173c4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@63173c4))
* Remove pxe / node /p2p-bootstrap docker images
([#3396](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3396))
([c236143](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c236143))
* Skip artifacts for prettier
([#3399](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3399))
([98d9e04](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@98d9e04))
* Update path to acir artifacts
([#3426](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3426))
([f56f88d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f56f88d))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.16.0</summary>

##
[0.16.0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.15.1...barretenberg.js-v0.16.0)
(2023-11-27)


### Miscellaneous

* Plumbs noir subrepo into yarn-project.
([#3420](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3420))
([63173c4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@63173c4))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.16.0</summary>

##
[0.16.0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.15.1...barretenberg-v0.16.0)
(2023-11-27)


### Features

* Goblin proof construction
([#3332](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3332))
([6a7ebb6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6a7ebb6))
* Noir subrepo.
([#3369](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3369))
([d94d88b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@d94d88b))


### Miscellaneous

* Deterministically deduplicate
`cached_partial_non_native_field_multiplication` across wasm32 and
native compilations
([#3425](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3425))
([5524933](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5524933))
* Plumbs noir subrepo into yarn-project.
([#3420](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3420))
([63173c4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@63173c4))
* Update path to acir artifacts
([#3426](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#3426))
([f56f88d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f56f88d))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants