Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: replacing use of L2Tx with TxEffect #4858

Closed

Conversation

benesjan
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #4845

Copy link
Contributor Author

benesjan commented Feb 29, 2024

@benesjan benesjan changed the title refactor: replacing use of L2Tx with TxEffect refactor: replacing use of L2Tx with TxEffect Feb 29, 2024
@@ -438,27 +438,12 @@ export class PXEService implements PXE {
});
}

public async getTxReceipt(txHash: TxHash): Promise<TxReceipt> {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved the implementation to aztec node since I needed an access to block source to be able to populated the block number and block hash of the receipt.

@benesjan benesjan force-pushed the 02-29-refactor_replacing_use_of_L2Tx_with_TxEffect branch from 5d9f7fd to 28fadab Compare February 29, 2024 15:04
@benesjan benesjan force-pushed the 02-29-refactor_replacing_use_of_L2Tx_with_TxEffect branch from 88dc0c8 to 29348d6 Compare February 29, 2024 16:04
@benesjan
Copy link
Contributor Author

benesjan commented Mar 1, 2024

Can't push to this branch anymore (probably because graphite expired). So I am opening a new branch #4876

@benesjan benesjan closed this Mar 1, 2024
@ludamad ludamad deleted the 02-29-refactor_replacing_use_of_L2Tx_with_TxEffect branch August 22, 2024 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Replace usage of L2Tx with TxEffect and nuke it
1 participant