Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Bump provernet agents to 8 and speed up bot #8280

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

spalladino
Copy link
Collaborator

So we have capacity to prove larger blocks

@spalladino spalladino merged commit 2b1ea31 into master Aug 29, 2024
36 checks passed
@spalladino spalladino deleted the palla/bump-provernet-agents branch August 29, 2024 21:18
spalladino added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
So we have capacity to prove larger blocks
TomAFrench added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2024
* master: (28 commits)
  chore: bump noir-bignum to 0.3.2 (#8276)
  feat: Populate epoch 0 from initial validator set (#8286)
  git subrepo push --branch=master noir-projects/aztec-nr
  git_subrepo.sh: Fix parent in .gitrepo file. [skip ci]
  chore: replace relative paths to noir-protocol-circuits
  git subrepo push --branch=master barretenberg
  chore(master): Release 0.51.1 (#8218)
  feat(avm): integrate new range and cmp gadgets (#8165)
  chore: rename process to propose for clarity (#8265)
  chore: Bump provernet agents to 8 and speed up bot (#8280)
  feat(avm): avm recursive verifier cpp (#8162)
  feat: moving fee payout + make proof submission sequential (#8262)
  feat: Block cheat codes in anvil (#8277)
  feat: wallet tx management (#8246)
  refactor(avm): replace range and cmp with gadgets (#8164)
  fix(docs): Update entrypoint details on accounts page (#8184)
  feat: l1-publisher cleanup (#8148)
  feat(avm): range check gadget (#7967)
  fix(ci): spot-runner-action was not built (#8274)
  fix: ts codegen (#8267)
  ...
codygunton pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2024
So we have capacity to prove larger blocks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants