Compute GalleryRP 2024-03-03 version

[grizzlytheodore]

ARM team, please review this PR. This version includes several features:
#30504 - new operations, suppression approved, ARM review/approved
#30505 - new property
#30536 - new property
#30558 - new property
#30658 - new property
#31310 - minor change to error in PR above
#30842 - new property
#30855 - new property
#30885 - new property
#31094 - new operation
#31430 - breaking change

Breaking change justification:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2023-07-03/communityGallery.json#L298-L308
"CommunityGalleryDisclaimer" should be "type: object" instead of "string".

In SDKs, it is automatically flattened, and the payloads send out 'string' in the payload in place of "CommunityGalleryDisclaimer"
Example: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/f5a45365f5560f5c6b1a542f740bd2e8ccaae584/sdk/compute/Azure.ResourceManager.Compute/src/Generated/CommunityGalleryImageData.cs#L97

I've checked with feature owners and the backend also is just a string for disclaimer, instead of nested object.
This change is to reflect the backend correctly, and fix the error made in Swagger definition

The REST API payload already expects and receives "string" for disclaimer, so there is no change in any customer experien e

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

• New resource provider.
• New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been created in adherence to OpenAPI specs PR creation guidance).
• Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
• Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
• Convert existing OpenAPI spec to TypeSpec spec (do not combine this with implementing changes for a new API version).
• Other, please clarify:
  • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

• I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
• I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
  ARM resource provider contract and
  REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
  I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

• First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
• If you don't have permissions to remove or add labels to the PR, request write access per aka.ms/azsdk/access#request-access-to-rest-api-or-sdk-repositories
• To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
• For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
  and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
• For help with ARM review (PR workflow diagram Step 2), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
• If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
  This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
• If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

[openapi-pipeline-app]

Generated ApiView

Language	Package Name	ApiView Link
JavaScript	@azure/arm-compute	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/a802869b6345406cbb6d1e487132d7dd?revisionId=23e2926b6ccd4839b8bf7b2f393cc49b
Java	azure-resourcemanager-compute-generated	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/eb099b2efb0f4373a854e09003a6b31d?revisionId=0c70bbae901a46d7afc039d5fec64a8a
.Net	Azure.ResourceManager.Compute	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/7fec998c6beb4201bb99c335d06c70fa?revisionId=5405b1c4fc0f4051b8892097b915bec4
Go	sdk/resourcemanager/compute/armcompute	https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/13fa09201aa545c19d240f82d38c09c9?revisionId=40753be2811a438c85151d7573b815af

[grizzlytheodore]

    "resourceArmId": {

you can add the arm-id format

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:3802 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

addressed: 7bcc1af

[grizzlytheodore]

    "softDeletedArtifactType": {

can this have any string? or it can be used an enum here?

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:3806 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

addressed. updated to enum : eebef06

[grizzlytheodore]

what are the possible values for this property?

updated as enum: 1dd8817

[grizzlytheodore]

      "description": "This property specifies the name of the platformAttributes. It could be either source_image_publisher or source_image_offer or source_image_sku or source_image_version"

from the description it can be converted to an enum

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:4198 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

this is read-only. the description is updated: b3db98a

[grizzlytheodore]

    "executedValidations": {

you should add a x-ms-identifiers also for arrays in this definition

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:4114 in 5e7c233. [](commit_id = 5e7c233, deletion_comment = False)

addressed": 7bcc1af

[ms-bogdan-rotaru]

    "resourceArmId": {

This is fixed, marking as resolved

---

In reply to: 2470781326

---

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:3802 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

[ms-bogdan-rotaru]

    "softDeletedArtifactType": {

This still requires input

---

In reply to: 2470782889

---

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:3806 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

[ms-bogdan-rotaru]

    "status": {

This is fixed, marking as resolved

---

In reply to: 2470787477

---

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:4177 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

[ms-bogdan-rotaru]

@grizzlytheodore There still are some open comments, please address or close them where applicable.

[grizzlytheodore]

    "softDeletedArtifactType": {

This still requires input

In reply to: 2470782889

Refers to: specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/GalleryRP/stable/2024-03-03/gallery.json:3806 in 98b2dc9. [](commit_id = 98b2dc9, deletion_comment = False)

what change does this need? I updated to enum as shown here: #31254 (comment)