Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverting change: Replacing PartialSync for IncrementalSync for sync type and updating examples. #4303

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2018
Merged

Reverting change: Replacing PartialSync for IncrementalSync for sync type and updating examples. #4303

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2018

Conversation

Francisco-Gamino
Copy link
Contributor

@Francisco-Gamino Francisco-Gamino commented Oct 22, 2018

Notes: After a discussion with the feature team, we decided syncType using PartialSync and FullSync is descriptive enough and our clients (cmdlets and Portal) already relied on this property, so we are going to leave it as is.

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 22, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3125

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 22, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#287

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 22, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#3876

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 22, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#3113

@sergey-shandar
Copy link
Contributor

@vrdmr please, review.

Copy link
Member

@vrdmr vrdmr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Oct 23, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#1783

mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
…sion preview/2021-04-01-preview (#4369)

* [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.MobileNetwork to add version preview/2021-04-01-preview (#4303)

* msazuredev/12524 merge sim and simProfile

* fix duplicated example warning

* Remove spurious mobile network Sims_ListByMobileNetwork operation (#4317)

* Dev mobilenetwork microsoft.mobile network 2021 04 01 preview 6452 (#4329)

* mobile network name pattern after confirmed with Fiona

* iccid, imsi, ki and opc code pattern

* make sim examples comply with patterns

* Update mobileNetwork.json (#4319)

* Update mobileNetwork.json

* Create SimIdListByNetwork.json

* Rename SimIdListByNetwork.json to SimIdListByMobileNetwork.json

Co-authored-by: jiandongcui <85569904+jiandongcui@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix examples for deleted sims field in mobile network

* resolve r2063

* resolve lint error

* resolve more lint error

* prettier fix format

* examples in 2021-04-01 should use api-version 2021-04-01-preview

* Add Go multi-api section

Co-authored-by: nickweeds2 <80526218+nickweeds2@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: samaddip <66083466+samaddip@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sathiyan Sivathas <sathiyan.sivathas@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants