Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscellaneous Table clients API changes #21940

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
May 28, 2021
Merged

Miscellaneous Table clients API changes #21940

merged 18 commits into from
May 28, 2021

Conversation

vcolin7
Copy link
Member

@vcolin7 vcolin7 commented May 28, 2021

  • Removed non-WithResponse maximal overloads for updateEntity(), upsertEntity() and getEntity().
  • Removed listEntities() and getEntity() overloads that supported TableEntity subclasses in TableAsyncClient.
  • Removed the synchronized keyword from submitBatch() methods in TableAsyncClient.
  • Updated CHANGELOG.

vcolin7 added 17 commits May 24, 2021 17:50
…ated the submitTransaction() and submitTransactionWithResponse() methods in TableAsyncClient and TableClient.
… Intoduced a new exception for transactional batch operations : TablesTransactionFailedException. Introduced a new return type containing all sub-responses from submitting a transactional batch of actions: TableTransactionResult.
…cept an ifUnchanged flag instead of an eTag for conditional operations.
# Conflicts:
#	sdk/tables/azure-data-tables/src/main/java/com/azure/data/tables/TableAsyncClient.java
#	sdk/tables/azure-data-tables/src/main/java/com/azure/data/tables/TableClient.java
#	sdk/tables/azure-data-tables/src/main/java/com/azure/data/tables/implementation/models/TransactionalBatchAction.java
…ty() and getEntity(). Updated CHANGELOG. Removed listEntities() and getEntity() overloads that supported TableEntity subclasses in TableAsyncClient.
# Conflicts:
#	sdk/tables/azure-data-tables/CHANGELOG.md
@vcolin7 vcolin7 requested a review from srnagar May 28, 2021 20:36
@vcolin7 vcolin7 requested a review from conniey as a code owner May 28, 2021 20:36
Copy link
Member

@srnagar srnagar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@vcolin7 vcolin7 merged commit 996d2de into Azure:master May 28, 2021
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
Machinelearningservices microsoft.machine learning services 2022 12 01 preview (Azure#21761)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.MachineLearningServices from version preview/2022-10-01-preview to version 2022-12-01-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Add Dec API Registries Swagger (Azure#21419)

* add december registries swagger + examples

* add status code 202 in examples

* fix 202 examples

* fixes

* fixes

* fix

* add 202 back in for put/patch

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>

* remove location (Azure#21430)

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>

* remove readonly flag on schedules property for CI (Azure#21653)

Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <naagarw@microsoft.com>

* add missing workspace properties (Azure#21725)

* December preview updating mfe.json specs (Azure#21510)

* December preview updating mfe.json specs

* MFE Dec 2022 Preview API - Adding logbase

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix, add missing location

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - typo fix

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix api version in automljob example

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error

* Fix  for 1006 - RemovedDefinition (RecurrenceTrigger,CronTrigger) (Azure#21822)

* fix ReadonlyPropertyChanged of MLC (Azure#21814)

Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com>

* fixed custom-words conflict (Azure#21829)

* fix custom-words conflict merge (Azure#21830)

* example fix (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (Azure#21832)

Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>

* example fix, use correct api preview version  - (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (Azure#21833)

Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>

* Revert breaking change for MLC swagger 2022-12-01-preview (Azure#21885)

Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com>

* Revert Connection Category back to enum. (Azure#21939)

* revert provisioning state change (Azure#21940)

* remove body (Azure#21978)

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call (Azure#22005)

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call

* fix examples for patch - remove body

* fixed formatting

* Ivalbert fix patch2 (Azure#22006)

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call

* fix examples for patch - remove body

* fixed formatting

* fixed formatting

* Updated custom words (Azure#22262)

* Fixed prettier errors (Azure#22237)

* fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (Azure#22293)

* fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (Azure#22294)

* Example fix - OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY - Missing required property: triggerType (Azure#22317)

---------

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <23komal.yadav23@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <komalyadav@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <namanag16@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <naagarw@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: ZhidaLiu <zhili@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: libc16 <88697960+libc16@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <bingchenli@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <ivaliyivanov@Ivaliys-MacBook-Air.local>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants