-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing sdk in the path in codeowners file #18324
Conversation
Hello @ramya-rao-a! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer. What is Check Enforcer?Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass. Why am I getting this message?You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged. What should I do now?If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows: What if I am onboarding a new service?Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment: |
/check-enforcer override |
Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:
These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check. Give feedback on thisFrom the bot dev teamWe've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments. Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin. |
Review request for Microsoft.ContainerService to add version 2022-02-01 (Azure#18324) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService from version stable/2022-01-01 to version 2022-02-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * Update readmes for the 2022-02-01 dev branch of container service (Azure#17887) * update readme * remove useless -only tags * Fix violated rule R2026 for 2022-02-01 managedCluster swagger (Azure#18024) * fix allof * add missing type * GA alias minor version (Azure#18038) * GA alias minor version * polish more details on kubernetesVersion and currentKubernetesVersion * Update specification/containerservice/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/stable/2022-02-01/managedClusters.json minor revision Co-authored-by: Matthew Christopher <matthchr@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Christopher <matthchr@microsoft.com> * add missing type object (Azure#18115) * Revert "GA alias minor version (Azure#18038)" (Azure#18291) This reverts commit 3a99cda3cb48e05c74923f5467c0737014322b0f. * Align modifications of several common definitions with 2022-02-02-preview for container service 2022-02-01 (Azure#18216) * sync modification * fix ref Co-authored-by: Jianping Zeng <zjpjack@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Christopher <matthchr@microsoft.com>
Fixing the incorrect path in the codeowners file