feat!: Let Hugr implement Circuit #91
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aborgna-q
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
Multiple small changes to the hugr API. Note that this doesn't update to the current HEAD, #91 will adapt to the changes from CQCL/hugr#498 and simplify the circuits. The goal of this separate PR is to reduce the diff noise there.
aborgna-q
force-pushed
the
feat/hugr-as-circuit
branch
from
772f1ba
to
9fc92da
Compare
aborgna-q
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HierarchyViewbound inCircuitwithHugrView(from feat: Implement petgraph traits on Hugr hugr#498), which is implemented byHugr.Hugrs anymore.Circuit::Comandsnow has a generic lifetime.PetgraphWrapperwhen needed instead of requiring Petgraph traits on everything.Circuit<'a>.Closes #84.
Blocked by CQCL/hugr#498.