Fix a bug where some addresses would be unverified due to padding #64
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
balanceSlot is padded to '0x' + 64 chars with leading zeros, however contractProof.storageProof[0]?.key isn't. This means that for some addresses (and for some tokens, if more are added) the balance slot will have leading zeros and proof key will not, failing the equality check.
Example:
Or just input 0xA4b06Da12C746666D08e1163CD18Ab57bA544291 at the demo https://lodestar-lightclient.chainsafe.io