-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ui tests for change password #2151
Conversation
Your Render PR Server URL is https://chainsafe-components-stage-pr-2151.onrender.com. Follow its progress at https://dashboard.render.com/static/srv-ca6ltg397ej6nr5hdidg. |
Your Render PR Server URL is https://files-ui-stage-pr-2151.onrender.com. Follow its progress at https://dashboard.render.com/static/srv-ca6lth397ej6nr5hdii0. |
Your Render PR Server URL is https://storage-ui-stage-pr-2151.onrender.com. Follow its progress at https://dashboard.render.com/static/srv-ca6lti397ej6nr5hdj4g. |
settingsPage.passwordInput().should("not.exist") | ||
settingsPage.confirmPasswordInput().should("not.exist") | ||
settingsPage.changePasswordButton().should("not.exist") | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to expand this check to include logging out and logging back in with the new password but I'm experiencing some weirdness with the fake metamask window / test wallet address. I'll look at that in a separate issue (#2156) so that this can be merged before I'm back online.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice, as suggested in the followup issue, we may want to make sure the call to the api is made, with the right data, but we can add this later when closing the said issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! agree with Tbaut with the assertion of the api call, but if we can do it in the new issue, then we can close this one
closes #2137