Remove the reviewer checklist from the PR template

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -108,64 +108,6 @@ This is a checklist for PR authors. Please make sure to complete all tasks and c
 - [ ] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
 - [ ] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
 
-<details>
-<summary><h4>PR Reviewer Checklist</h4>
-
-The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed
-</summary>
-
-- [ ] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
-- [ ] I verified the correct issue is linked in the `### Fixed Issues` section above
-- [ ] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
-    - [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the `Tests` section
-    - [ ] I verified the steps for expected offline behavior are in the `Offline steps` section
-    - [ ] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the `QA steps` section
-    - [ ] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
-    - [ ] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
-    - [ ] I tested this PR with a [High Traffic account](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/contributingGuides/CONTRIBUTING.md#high-traffic-accounts) against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
-- [ ] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on [all platforms](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/contributingGuides/CONTRIBUTING.md#make-sure-you-can-test-on-all-platforms)
-- [ ] I included screenshots or videos for tests on [all platforms](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/contributingGuides/CONTRIBUTING.md#make-sure-you-can-test-on-all-platforms)
-- [ ] I verified tests pass on **all platforms** & I tested again on:
-    - [ ] iOS / native
-    - [ ] Android / native
-    - [ ] iOS / Safari
-    - [ ] Android / Chrome
-    - [ ] MacOS / Chrome
-    - [ ] MacOS / Desktop
-- [ ] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
-- [ ] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see [Reviewing the code](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/contributingGuides/PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md#reviewing-the-code))
-    - [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. `toggleReport` and not `onIconClick`).
-    - [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
-    - [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
-    - [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all `src/languages/*` files
-    - [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the `Waiting for Copy` label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
-    - [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
-    - [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in [`STYLE.md`](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/contributingGuides/STYLE.md#jsdocs)) were followed
-- [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
-- [ ] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the [Review Guidelines](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/contributingGuides/PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md)
-- [ ] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like `Avatar`, I verified the components using `Avatar` have been tested & I retested again)
-- [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
-- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
-- [ ] I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
-- [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
-    - [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
-    - [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a `/** comment above it */`
-    - [ ] The file is named correctly
-    - [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
-    - [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
-    - [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to `this` properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for `onClick={this.submit}` the method `this.submit` should be bound to `this` in the constructor)
-    - [ ] Any internal methods bound to `this` are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid `this.submit = this.submit.bind(this);` if `this.submit` is never passed to a component event handler like `onClick`)
-    - [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
-    - [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
-- [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
-    - [ ] A similar style doesn't already exist
-    - [ ] The style can't be created with an existing [StyleUtils](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/styles/StyleUtils.js) function (i.e. `StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG`)
-- [ ] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like `Avatar` is modified, I verified that `Avatar` is working as expected in all cases)
-- [ ] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
-- [ ] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
-
-</details>
-
 ### Screenshots/Videos
 <details>
 <summary>Web</summary>