Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New preferences page layout #21852

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Jul 17, 2023
Merged

New preferences page layout #21852

merged 47 commits into from
Jul 17, 2023

Conversation

roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Jun 29, 2023

HOLD on #20663

Details

This PR was split off of #15462. It implements a new layout in the Settings -> Preferences page.

Fixed Issues

$ (partial) #12261

Tests

  1. Open the preferences page.
  2. Make sure it matches the screenshots.
  3. Test the UI for regressions.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests.

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
androidWeb.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
iOSWeb.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
iOS.mov
Android
android.mov

@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this Jun 29, 2023
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is branched off of #20663, so the diff will be smaller once that's merged.

@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [HOLD] New preferences page layout [WIP] New preferences page layout Jun 29, 2023
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [WIP] New preferences page layout New preferences page layout Jun 29, 2023
@roryabraham roryabraham marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2023 18:39
@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from a team as a code owner June 29, 2023 18:39
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from stitesExpensify and removed request for a team June 29, 2023 18:40
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 29, 2023

@stitesExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts is going to review this

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

allroundexperts commented Jun 29, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.12.44.07.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.1.06.53.AM.mov
Screenshot 2023-07-17 at 1 05 14 AM
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.1.02.44.AM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.12.50.36.AM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.1.02.09.AM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.1.03.20.AM.mov

container: this.animationDOMNode,
animationData: props.source,
- renderer: 'svg',
+ renderer: 'canvas',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found this seems to yield better framerates and also fixes a display but on iOS Safari with different animation (not yet included in the app)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed that on android web, the animation was extremely janky. When running it against localhost, it did not simply load.

Screen.Recording.2023-07-17.at.1.06.53.AM.mov
Screenshot 2023-07-17 at 1 05 14 AM

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

Make sure it matches the screenshots.

@roryabraham Can you post the screenshots? I saw some screenshots in the linked issue but since this is a partial implementation, it would be good to have the screenshots that this PR is implementing.

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts refresh the page maybe? GitHub was having issues but I posted all the screenshots before putting this in for review. I can still see them in the issue description

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts all fixed now

Comment on lines +43 to +59
export default function withEnvironment(WrappedComponent) {
const WithEnvironment = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
const {environment, environmentURL} = useContext(EnvironmentContext);
return (
<WrappedComponent
// eslint-disable-next-line react/jsx-props-no-spreading
{...props}
ref={props.forwardedRef}
ref={ref}
environment={environment}
environmentURL={environmentURL}
/>
);
}
});

WithEnvironment.displayName = `withEnvironment(${getComponentDisplayName(WrappedComponent)})`;
WithEnvironment.propTypes = {
forwardedRef: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.func, PropTypes.shape({current: PropTypes.instanceOf(React.Component)})]),
};
WithEnvironment.defaultProps = {
forwardedRef: undefined,
};
return React.forwardRef((props, ref) => (
<WithEnvironment
// eslint-disable-next-line react/jsx-props-no-spreading
{...props}
forwardedRef={ref}
/>
));

return WithEnvironment;
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts Jul 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think its better to add this function into a separate file. Also, if this HoC isn't being used at a lot of places, it might be a better idea to just get rid of it. I see that you've already created a hook for this.

return {
environment,
environmentURL,
isProduction: environment === CONST.ENVIRONMENT.PRODUCTION,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be part of the context value as well!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be happy to address this in a follow-up 👍🏼

I realize that this makes it so that the hook has to copy the object from the return value of useContext every time, which is a waste.

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solid work @roryabraham!

I have left some minor comments. However, you can merge this if you feel like those are not urgent enough to be addressed.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from MonilBhavsar July 16, 2023 20:43
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 16, 2023

@MonilBhavsar Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@MonilBhavsar MonilBhavsar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

src/components/HeaderWithBackButton/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

TIL about git mv, thanks @MonilBhavsar!

and thanks for the comments @allroundexperts. I think there's a number of good thoughts there but it's more important to get this merged so I can implement the other pages soon here.

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit c735121 into main Jul 17, 2023
14 of 18 checks passed
@roryabraham roryabraham deleted the Rory-PreferencesNewLayout branch July 17, 2023 17:53
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.42-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 cancelled 🔪

Comment on lines +96 to +97
<View style={[styles.reportOptions, styles.flexRow, styles.pr5, styles.alignItemsCenter]}>
{shouldShowDownloadButton && (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This refactor has caused a deploy blocker #23129 as we have forgot to pass the children which was a change made in the deleted file but probably did not cause morege conflicts or it was missed when resolved.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, my bad I missed that change when resolving conflicts

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.42-26 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅


...withDelayToggleButtonStatePropTypes,
/** Ref passed to the component by React.forwardRef (do not pass from parent) */
innerRef: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.func, PropTypes.shape({current: PropTypes.instanceOf(React.Component)})]).isRequired,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #23093: Is there reason to make this prop required?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My reasoning was that since it's always passed by forwardRef, then it would make sense to have it be required. However I see now that it will be null/undefined if the parent doesn't pass a ref.

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

As per the checklist, this PR caused this regression #23102. It's explained here, but TLDR is that some code was removed previously and accidentally added back here which broke navigating to the parent report.

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

This minor issue was probably missed in the PR.

Issue: Preferences - Shows blue color in Bottom Safearea when going offline

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Go offline in IOS/native
  2. Go to settings -> Go to preferences
  3. See bottom Safearea

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants