Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed: dev: '0:undefined:' displayed in reaction emoji tooltip #23371

Conversation

jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor

@jfquevedol2198 jfquevedol2198 commented Jul 21, 2023

Details

#23307

Fixed Issues

$ #23307
PROPOSAL: #23307 (comment)

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Web, Desktop, mWeb, Mobile

  1. Open a chat
  2. Send a message
  3. React message with any emoji
  4. Right click on reacted emoji (Desktop & Web)
    Long touch on Emoji (Mobile & mWeb)
  5. Verify Emoji & Count & user details are shown correctly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web image
Mobile Web - Chrome image
Mobile Web - Safari image
Desktop image
iOS image
Android image

@jfquevedol2198 jfquevedol2198 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 21, 2023 20:45
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Santhosh-Sellavel and removed request for a team July 21, 2023 20:45
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 21, 2023

@Santhosh-Sellavel Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 21, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@jfquevedol2198 jfquevedol2198 force-pushed the fix/23307-0-undefined-reaction-emoji-tooltip branch from 2ca0b1d to e87117d Compare July 21, 2023 21:22
@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel I need to do extra thing on this PR?

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfquevedol2198 Include Test steps

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 23, 2023

Moved here #23371 (comment)

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

I noticed a couple of issues,

  1. One blue line border for the page. This happens on the main too. Check the image
  2. Reactions count is not updated immediately, unable to view the list if the emoji is just added by the user. Check video below for more. Again this is not related to the changes here
Screen.Recording.2023-07-24.at.1.18.18.AM.mov

@stitesExpensify Is these valid bugs to be reported or not thanks?

Copy link
Collaborator

@Santhosh-Sellavel Santhosh-Sellavel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly Looks good.

  1. Waiting for test steps and change from contributor
  2. Waiting for clarification from @stitesExpensify for this fixed: dev: '0:undefined:' displayed in reaction emoji tooltip #23371 (comment).

src/components/Reactions/ReportActionItemEmojiReactions.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel Test steps:

  1. Open a chat
  2. Send a message
  3. React message with any emoji
  4. Right click on reacted emoji (Desktop & Web)
    Long touch on Emoji (Mobile & mWeb)
  5. Displays expected result with correct reactions on Emoji and users list

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

I noticed a couple of issues,

  1. One blue line border for the page. This happens on the main too. Check the image
  2. Reactions count is not updated immediately, unable to view the list if the emoji is just added by the user. Check video below for more. Again this is not related to the changes here

Screen.Recording.2023-07-24.at.1.18.18.AM.mov
@stitesExpensify Is these valid bugs to be reported or not thanks?

@Santhosh-Sellavel #2 is done in PR update.
We need to do #1 on this PR, too?

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify self-requested a review July 24, 2023 15:16
@stitesExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Glad #2 is fixed. I don't think that #1 needs to be fixed in this PR, that can be reported separately

Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code seems to test well online. When offline, however when offline it is not possible to view who has reacted if you are the first. I think if we put this into the optimistic data instead of the success data it will be fixed

src/libs/actions/Report.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Report.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@stitesExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@jfquevedol2198 added a review. @Santhosh-Sellavel can you see if you agree with my comments?

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stitesExpensify @Santhosh-Sellavel
Thanks for reviewing kindly, I just updated.

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel @stitesExpensify
All requested changes are done

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@stitesExpensify Initiate workflow

@stitesExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I just realized on re-review that I don't think that this is the correct solution 😬

Emoji Reactions are no longer going to be stored on the reportAction message as of the PR that caused this bug. They are only going to be stored in the ${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS_REACTIONS}${reportActionID} collection. So the real solution here is actually to update the PopoverReactionList to get the reactions from there, as opposed to updating the optimistic data of the action. My apologies for not catching this earlier, but we shouldn't be updating ${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${originalReportID} when adding the reaction anymore 😞

Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code is looking much better. As soon as @Santhosh-Sellavel makes sure it tests well I'll merge.

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel can you please check so that I can update if have any issue?

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 25, 2023

@Santhosh-Sellavel Test steps:

  1. Open a chat
  2. Send a message
  3. React message with any emoji
  4. Right click on reacted emoji (Desktop & Web)
    Long touch on Emoji (Mobile & mWeb)
  5. Displays expected result with correct reactions on Emoji and users list

@jfquevedol2198 Looks good add it to the PR description thanks!

Step 5 Verify Emoji & Count & user details are shown correctly, thanks!

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel I just added Test Steps as QA steps in PR description. Thanks

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web & Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-07-26.at.4.46.05.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome & Mobile Web - Safari Screenshot 2023-07-24 at 1 11 20 AM
iOS & Android Screenshot 2023-07-24 at 12 57 03 AM

Copy link
Collaborator

@Santhosh-Sellavel Santhosh-Sellavel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM tests well!

All yours @stitesExpensify!

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stitesExpensify can we merge tonight this if all good?

@stitesExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

can we merge tonight this if all good?

Yes we can :)

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify merged commit e32ff5e into Expensify:main Jul 26, 2023
14 of 17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stitesExpensify in version: 1.3.46-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stitesExpensify in version: 1.3.47-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.46-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.47-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@jfquevedol2198
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel @stitesExpensify Whats the next step on this? This was first assignment for me so I am wondering..

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfquevedol2198 Just payment pending, please keep the discussion on the issue for general doubts thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants