Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wildan/fix/21518/client pusher method #24407

Merged

Conversation

wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor

@johncschuster , @allroundexperts

Details

Fix leaving a room from multiple devices and fix regression when splitting the bill

Fixed Issues

$ #21518
$ #22964
PROPOSAL: #21518 (comment)

Tests

Leave Room Test

  1. Open a room on the web and on another device (e.g. Android) using the same account
  2. Click room details and click Leave Room on one of the devices (e.g. web)
  3. The user should leave the room on both devices

Split bill test

  1. Go to Website
  2. Split bill.
  3. Verify that some of the recipients are a recipient with no interaction
  4. Click on preview.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Open a room on the web and on another device (e.g. Android) using the same account
  2. disconnect the internet on both
  3. Click room details and click Leave Room on one of the devices (e.g. web)
  4. At this point the user should only leave a room in the web version only.
  5. re-connect the internet connection
  6. The user should leave the room on both devices

QA Steps

  1. Open a room on the web and on another device (e.g. Android) using the same account
  2. Click room details and click Leave Room on one of the devices (e.g. web)
  3. The user should leave the room on both devices
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Recording.53.2.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
Recording.48.2.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Recording.49.2.mp4
Desktop
Recording.51.2.mp4
iOS
Recording.50.2.mp4
Android
Recording.47.mp4

@wildan-m wildan-m requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2023 06:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from allroundexperts and removed request for a team August 11, 2023 06:57
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 11, 2023

@allroundexperts Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

allroundexperts commented Aug 15, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.3.34.18.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.3.43.20.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.3.46.25.AM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.3.39.04.AM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.3.47.34.AM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.3.45.26.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@wildan-m Can you please merge main and resolve conflicts?

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts sure. Done.

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts any feedback on the implementation?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the delay @wildan-m. I'll look into it later today / early tomorrow.

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@wildan-m Can you please merge main again?

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts sure. done.

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allroundexperts not sure what causes some checks to fail. seems not related to this PR

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's related to mapbox integration.

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

resolved after this post.

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

@wildan-m It looks like ONYXKEYS.js is modified in your branch but has been replaced by ONYXKEYS.ts in main. Can you please resolve the conflict and push it?

@allroundexperts let's try to get this reviewed before the merge conflict merry-go-round comes back around to haunt Wildan again? 😅

@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

@deetergp, @allroundexperts done.

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

I'll recheck this again tomorrow 🤞🤞🤞

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts is this still on your list for today?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts is this still on your list for today?

Yep. Once I wake up tomorrow!

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing well now!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins September 21, 2023 22:53
@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit fa6a767 into Expensify:main Sep 22, 2023
12 of 13 checks passed
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Congrats, that’s your 5th PR merged! 🎉 Do you know about the ContributorPlus role? It’s an opportunity to earn more in the Expensify Open Source community. Keep up the great work - thanks!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.73-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.73-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.74-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 1.3.74-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

hoangzinh added a commit to hoangzinh/Expensify-App that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…1518/client-pusher-method"

This reverts commit fa6a767, reversing
changes made to b50dfac.
Comment on lines +339 to +340
useEffect(() => {
// Ensures subscription event succeeds when the report/workspace room is created optimistically.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should have early returned if reportID is null to avoid the console error mentioned in #29116.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@wildan-m wildan-m Nov 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fedirjh Thanks for your feedback. We did it here and here, but we might also need to put it in useEffect

The issue also related to this function:

function getReportID(route) {
// // The reportID is used inside a collection key and should not be empty, as an empty reportID will result in the entire collection being returned.
return String(lodashGet(route, 'params.reportID', null));
}

it returned 'null' string instead of an actual null.

I'd recommend to change it to:

function getReportID(route) {
    const reportID = lodashGet(route, 'params.reportID', null);
    return reportID !== null ? String(reportID) : null;
}

@luacmartins, @allroundexperts, considering that this has passed the regression period, and any change would require re-testing. What should we do in this situation? Will there be any adjustments?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd recommend to change it to:

We attempted this in PR #29590, but it resulted in a regression, so we reverted the changes in PR #29893. The issue arises from the fact that getReportID is utilized within the withOnyx HOC. When null is passed as its value, Onyx will return the entire collection. Therefore, it was intentional for getReportID to return a 'null' string when the report is empty.

key: ({route}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${getReportID(route)}`,

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fedirjh seems you've resolved it here. thank you

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we also need to check onyx report reportId availability to avoid #38174

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants