Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove sideloading of Onyx data for attachment modal #30866

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen commented Nov 3, 2023

Details

This PR removes some deprecated methods that were loading data into the components without using Onyx properly.

Fixed Issues

Part of #27262

Tests

  1. Create a money request using the "scan" method
  2. After creating the request you will be on the chat report with a preview of the request
  3. Click on the request preview to go to the report details
  4. Click on the request again to go to the request details
  5. Click on the image of the request
  6. Verify that a modal opens and displays the image properly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

image

Android: mWeb Chrome

Note: My emulator is not able to load the site in chrome due to URLs not loading and HOSTs setup needing to be fixed

iOS: Native

Note: our local emulators do not show receipts due to our WARP client that we have installed.
image

iOS: mWeb Safari ![image](https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/1228807/839e889a-441b-49a3-b715-1235ce44c3e5)
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

image

MacOS: Desktop

image

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 3, 2023

@dangrous Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from dangrous November 3, 2023 18:00
@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 3, 2023

I can help if requires C+ review

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 3, 2023

@situchan That would be helpful, yes please!

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 6, 2023

@situchan would you be able to review this, please? Also bumping @dangrous for review.

Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me

Comment on lines 233 to 247
key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${report ? report.parentReportID : '0'}`,
},
parentReportActions: {
key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${report ? report.parentReportID : '0'}`,
canEvict: false,
},
}),

// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-multiple-onyx-in-file
withOnyx({
transaction: {
key: ({report, parentReportActions}) => {
const parentReportAction = lodashGet(parentReportActions, [report.parentReportActionID]);
return `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION}${lodashGet(parentReportAction, 'originalMessage.IOUTransactionID', 0)}`;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Regarding these changes, can you confirm that parentReportID, originalMessage.IOUTransactionID can never be empty string? Because if empty string, it will return all reportActions, transactions

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would never be able to guarantee that they could never be empty strings, but the chances of them being an empty string is very very very unlikely. This is how all key functions load data from params, so I don't think there is anything special that needs to be done here. The most important part is that lodashGet() needs to provide a default value (which it does).

Comment on lines 174 to 195
withOnyx({
reportActions: {
key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${report.reportID}`,
canEvict: false,
},
parentReport: {
key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${report ? report.parentReportID : '0'}`,
},
parentReportActions: {
key: ({report}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${report ? report.parentReportID : '0'}`,
canEvict: false,
},
}),

// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-multiple-onyx-in-file
withOnyx({
transaction: {
key: ({report, parentReportActions}) => {
const parentReportAction = lodashGet(parentReportActions, [report.parentReportActionID]);
return `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION}${lodashGet(parentReportAction, 'originalMessage.IOUTransactionID', 0)}`;
},
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that #28866 is completely removing multiple withOnyx.

Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of questions, following the questions @situchan asked as well.

/** The parent of `report` */
parentReport: reportPropTypes,

/** The specific action that links to the parent report */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** The specific action that links to the parent report */
/** The specific actions that link to the parent report */

Unless I'm misunderstanding this. If we're only sending one action, can we send the action itself instead of this container?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not possible to get the single action via withOnyx() so the component must receive all the parent report actions and then lookup the specific report action with const parentReportAction = parentReportActions[report.parentReportActionID];

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll update the comment for this prop

@situchan situchan mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2023
61 tasks
@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 7, 2023

OK, I have updated this PR to remove the nested withOnyx() calls and to update a comment to be more accurate. This is ready for review again.

dangrous
dangrous previously approved these changes Nov 7, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I'm getting a 404 error when following the testing steps but it's requesting a specific png so I think it's an unrelated issue I'll figure out separately. If @situchan can test successfully, that works for me! Code updates look good.

parentReport: reportPropTypes,

/** The report actions of the parent report */
parentReportActions: PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This kind of mistake is easy to miss

Suggested change
parentReportActions: PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes),
parentReportActions: PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape(reportActionPropTypes)),

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, thank you. I went back and forth on parentReportAction and parentReportActions and forgot to update this.

@@ -10,11 +10,13 @@ import CONST from '@src/CONST';
/**
* Constructs the initial component state from report actions
* @param {Object} report
* @param {Object} parentReportAction
* @param {Array} reportActions
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure why this is array

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 8, 2023

@situchan I have addressed your comments. I found another proptype that needed updated and I also found an unused param report that could be cleaned up.

@tgolen tgolen requested a review from situchan November 8, 2023 18:14
@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 9, 2023

@situchan bump for review please

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 9, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mchrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
msafari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 9, 2023

@tgolen regression: attachment modal header title briefly shows "Attachment"

mchrome.mov

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 9, 2023

@situchan Thanks for reporting that. I was largely unable to reproduce the issue. On my emulator, I guess the transition happens so fast that I cannot see it. I made an improvement to the code to hopefully improve the header title so that It does not default to either attachment or receipt until it absolutely knows which one it is.

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 9, 2023

@situchan Thanks for reporting that. I was largely unable to reproduce the issue. On my emulator, I guess the transition happens so fast that I cannot see it. I made an improvement to the code to hopefully improve the header title so that It does not default to either attachment or receipt until it absolutely knows which one it is.

It's known that native app is super slow in android emulator. So if you test on that device, you will clearly notice. Also noticeable on android emulator chrome

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 9, 2023

One more: download icon changes to three dot

Screen.Recording.2023-11-10.at.3.37.23.AM.mov

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 9, 2023

OK, I've pushed a fix for that too. I'm a bit stuck. My android build keeps failing (of course, right at the last step), so I've been trying to get it built and tested on Android but haven't had much luck. The third time is the charm, right?

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 9, 2023

Now found more serious regression:
Not found page briefly shows while scanning request

Screen.Recording.2023-11-10.at.4.35.04.AM.mov

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen single withOnyx PR was reverted. I think we should go back to multiple withOnyx in this PR for now.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 13, 2023

OK, I agree. I'll switch this to use multiple withOnyx() for now. This is a bit lower on my list of priorities, so I might not get to it until later this week.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Nov 13, 2023

OK, I've updated this to use multiple withOnyx, so it looks like it behaves a little more expectantly now. Can you please take another look at it @situchan ?

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good now

Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.1.49.54.AM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dangrous all yours

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from lakchote November 13, 2023 19:52
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2023

@lakchote Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2023

🎯 @situchan, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #31273.

Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, I think this makes sense!

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to go ahead and merge, not sure why Melvin tagged @lakchote

@dangrous dangrous merged commit cd35dfa into main Nov 13, 2023
15 checks passed
@dangrous dangrous deleted the tgolen-improve-proploading branch November 13, 2023 20:50
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 1.3.99-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.99-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 1.4.0-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants