Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MentionsV2] Room mentions suggestions #39697

Conversation

robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

@robertKozik robertKozik commented Apr 5, 2024

Details

This PR introduces suggestions support for new type of mentions - room mentions.

Fixed Issues

$ #39532
PROPOSAL: N/A - design doc

Tests

  1. Create several rooms within workspace
  2. Open room chat and start typing room mentions (room name with # prefix), verify that suggestions are displayed above the composer.
  3. Verify that every room inside suggestions is connected with the same policy as opened room
  4. Open 1:1 Chat
  5. Open a room that doesn't belong to a policy, verify that no auto-complete widget is present while typing room mention
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as test steps

QA Steps

Same as test steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.13.00.54.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.13.28.01.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.13.47.21.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.13.34.55.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.13.39.42.mov

@robertKozik robertKozik marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 16:28
@robertKozik robertKozik requested a review from a team as a code owner April 5, 2024 16:28
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from paultsimura and removed request for a team April 5, 2024 16:28
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 5, 2024

@paultsimura Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@paultsimura
Copy link
Contributor

@rlinoz could you please give me access to the doc, or attach the screenshots of the relevant section?

@paultsimura
Copy link
Contributor

This PR enables room mentions in any report that belongs to the same policy (e.g. in policy expense chats, expense reports, threads in them, etc.), while the issue description says it should be available only in policy rooms – what is the real expectation here?

src/components/MentionSuggestions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/MentionSuggestions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 261 to 264
if (!ReportUtils.isGroupPolicy(report) || !isValidRoomName(report?.reportName ?? '')) {
// checking validity of room name removes Policy Expense Chats
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you consider using just ReportUtils.isChatRoom?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not entirely convinced that isChatRoom would be the best fit here. This check seems to filter out reports that are not connected with group policy, while the additional room name validation check filters out the Policy Expense chats.

I'm not deeply familiar with report handling, so if you believe isChatRoom would work well in this context based on your experience, I'm open to it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a discussion in Slack:
Please create a separate function in ReportUtils:

function canReportBeMentionedWithinPolicy(report: OnyxEntry<Report>, policyId: string): boolean {
    if (report?.policyID !== policyId) {
        return false;
    }

    return isChatRoom(report) && !isThread(report);
}

And use it for filtering the reports here.

@rlinoz
Copy link
Contributor

rlinoz commented Apr 8, 2024

This PR enables room mentions in any report that belongs to the same policy (e.g. in policy expense chats, expense reports, threads in them, etc.), while the issue description says it should be available only in policy rooms – what is the real expectation here?

I updated the issue, but we should be able to mention policy rooms in any report that belongs to a policy.

@rlinoz rlinoz self-requested a review April 8, 2024 16:05
@paultsimura
Copy link
Contributor

@robertKozik could you please merge main as well?

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@paultsimura done!

@paultsimura
Copy link
Contributor

@paultsimura
Copy link
Contributor

I'll be filling the checklist in the meantime

@paultsimura
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android09.18.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
chrome09.18.mp4
iOS: Native
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-04-10.at.09.15.3709.18.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-04-10.at.09.14.5909.18.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-10.at.08.58.1609.07.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-04-10.at.09.02.2609.07.mp4

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robertKozik please address this as well:

https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/39697/files#r1557984758

Sure, done 😉

Copy link
Contributor

@paultsimura paultsimura left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ✔️

Copy link
Contributor

@rlinoz rlinoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works great!

Just a couple of typos

@@ -171,6 +171,12 @@ type ComposerWithSuggestionsProps = ComposerWithSuggestionsOnyxProps &
/** The parent report ID */
// eslint-disable-next-line react/no-unused-prop-types -- its used in the withOnyx HOC
parentReportID: string | undefined;

/** Whether chat is a reoprt from group policy */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** Whether chat is a reoprt from group policy */
/** Whether chat is a report from group policy */

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should say "chat" here. I think it's just:

Suggested change
/** Whether chat is a reoprt from group policy */
/** Whether report is from group policy */

nextState.suggestedMentions = suggestions;
nextState.shouldShowSuggestionMenu = !!suggestions.length;
}

const shouldDisplayMenetionsSuggestions = isGroupPolicyReport && (isValidRoomName(suggestionWord.toLowerCase()) || prefix === '');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo

Suggested change
const shouldDisplayMenetionsSuggestions = isGroupPolicyReport && (isValidRoomName(suggestionWord.toLowerCase()) || prefix === '');
const shouldDisplayMentionsSuggestions = isGroupPolicyReport && (isValidRoomName(suggestionWord.toLowerCase()) || prefix === '');

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const shouldDisplayMenetionsSuggestions = isGroupPolicyReport && (isValidRoomName(suggestionWord.toLowerCase()) || prefix === '');
const shouldDisplayRoomMentionsSuggestions = isGroupPolicyReport && (isValidRoomName(suggestionWord.toLowerCase()) || prefix === '');

This variable is only for room mentions, right?

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like the style is a little bit different than what is in the design doc. Can we try to match that?

image

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

cc @shawnborton

@paultsimura

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Slack doesn't seem to sort alphabetically. I'm sure there's some rhyme or reason to how they order, though I'm not sure what it is.

image

@rlinoz
Copy link
Contributor

rlinoz commented Apr 11, 2024

Testing on slack it seems quite random though

@rlinoz rlinoz dismissed their stale review April 11, 2024 17:06

Missed one comment

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorting would be a simple change, let me know if we decided on implementing it 👀

@rlinoz
Copy link
Contributor

rlinoz commented Apr 11, 2024

I think we can go ahead and sort alphabetically and later decide on a better way.

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rlinoz done

@rlinoz
Copy link
Contributor

rlinoz commented Apr 11, 2024

@robertKozik looks good to me, but lint is upset

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Damn, didn't noticed - should be alright now

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you think we can merge it today? It will unblock the live search issue

rlinoz
rlinoz previously approved these changes Apr 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rlinoz rlinoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

All yours @puneetlath

Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath puneetlath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Just a comment about comments 😄

@@ -12,17 +12,17 @@ import Avatar from './Avatar';
import Text from './Text';

type Mention = {
/** Display name of the user */
/** Display name of the mention */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** Display name of the mention */
/** Display text of the mention */

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think? Actually not sure.

alternateText: string;

/** Email/phone number of the user */
login?: string;
/** handle of the mention */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not totally understanding from these prop descriptions what the difference between text, alternateText, and handle is. Maybe we could make these comments a bit more descriptive?

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@puneetlath updated the comments. Please check if now it's more descriptive 😄

Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath puneetlath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating! Let's just make the capitalization consistent and then I'm happy :)

src/components/MentionSuggestions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/MentionSuggestions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Puneet Lath <puneet@expensify.com>
@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done! 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath puneetlath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for bearing with me

@rlinoz rlinoz merged commit 5f04270 into Expensify:main Apr 12, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/rlinoz in version: 1.4.63-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.63-21 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants