Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infer DOI from ArXiv identifier #10449

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

HoussemNasri
Copy link
Member

@HoussemNasri HoussemNasri commented Oct 5, 2023

Closes #10426

Adding to the DOI cleanup action: If an entry has an eprint field that contains an ArXiv ID, infer the DOI field.

The infer logic is based on this article: https://blog.arxiv.org/2022/02/17/new-arxiv-articles-are-now-automatically-assigned-dois/

Mandatory checks

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.


if (doi.isPresent()) {
// Update Doi
Optional<FieldChange> change = entry.setField(StandardField.DOI, doi.get().getDOI());
change.ifPresent(changes::add);
removeFieldValue(entry, field, changes);
}

if (StandardField.EPRINT == field && fieldContentOpt.isPresent()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the isPresent check for fieldContentOPt is not necessary here as it's already covered by the ifPresent

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch, it's removed now.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 5, 2023
Merged via the queue into JabRef:main with commit 3f53201 Oct 5, 2023
14 checks passed
Siedlerchr added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2023
…tworkShare

* upstream/main:
  Infer DOI from ArXiv identifier (#10449)
  Add TexShop Icon (#10447)
  Fix PDF export (#10361)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
Siedlerchr added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2023
…in-protected-terms-files

* upstream/main:
  Update src/main/java/org/jabref/logic/exporter/AtomicFileOutputStream.java
  Fix saving on network drive under macOS
  Infer DOI from ArXiv identifier (#10449)
  Add TexShop Icon (#10447)
  Fix PDF export (#10361)
  Fixed SpringerFetcherTest and ACMPortalFetcherTest (#10445)
  Bump org.openrewrite.rewrite from 6.3.11 to 6.3.16 (#10442)
  Update all of lucene
  Bump org.apache.lucene:lucene-core from 9.7.0 to 9.8.0
  Bump com.dlsc.gemsfx:gemsfx from 1.77.0 to 1.82.0
  Accept LaTeX errors in comment field (#10436)
  fix checkstyle
  fix escaping of slashes
  fix checkstyle  and l10n
  Add TeXShop (macOS only)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Import pdf - update DOI
2 participants