Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for issue 2811: bibtexkey generator does not use crossref information #3248

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 6, 2017

Conversation

125m125
Copy link
Contributor

@125m125 125m125 commented Oct 2, 2017

see #2811
The BibTex key generator now uses crossreferenced entries if required fields are empty.

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described
  • Tests created for changes
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef
  • Check documentation status (Issue created for outdated help page at help.jabref.org?)

@125m125 125m125 changed the title Fix for issue 2811 Fix for issue 2811: bibtexkey generator does not use crossref information Oct 2, 2017
Copy link
Member

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution! Very good!
Just remove the line with the sys out and it looks very good

String bibtexString = "@ARTICLE{entry2, author={Mari D. Herland and Mona-Iren Hauge and Ingeborg M. Helgeland}}";
BibEntry entry2 = BibtexParser.singleFromString(bibtexString, importFormatPreferences).get();
database.insertEntry(entry2);
System.out.println(entry1.getResolvedFieldOrAlias(FieldName.AUTHOR, database));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like you have forgotten to remove the system out print here

Copy link
Member

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you again for a great contribution! I only have a small remark concerning the tests and then this can be merged.

BibEntry entry1 = new BibEntry();
entry1.setField(FieldName.CROSSREF, "entry2");
database.insertEntry(entry1);
String bibtexString = "@ARTICLE{entry2, author={Simon Holland}}";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please construct the entry by hand (as you did for entry1) instead of using the parser. I know, the other tests also work like that but this is bad design.

@lenhard
Copy link
Member

lenhard commented Oct 6, 2017

@125m125 That is really an impressive amount of tests, good job!

There are two merge conflicts. Could you resolve those? Once that's done this PR is ready to go into master.

@lenhard
Copy link
Member

lenhard commented Oct 6, 2017

And once again thanks!

@lenhard lenhard merged commit 0a7a718 into JabRef:master Oct 6, 2017
Siedlerchr added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2017
* upstream/master: (113 commits)
  Open statistics dialog from correct thread (#3272)
  Fix for issue 2811: bibtexkey generator does not use crossref information (#3248)
  Fix for issue 3143: Import entry from clipboard in different formats (#3243)
  French translation correction (#3262)
  Wait to ask to collect anonymous statistics in JabRefExecutorService to allow jvm to terminate (#3266)
  Directory pattern bracketed expressions (#3238)
  Show development information
  Release v4.0
  add another author to mailmap
  moved changelog entry to the right category
  update new AUTHORS info
  Update log4j from 2.9.0 -> 2.9.1
  fix dblp fetcher
  Add missing Turkish translation
  Add "-console" parameter for Windows launcher (#3242)
  Path check converted to if statement
  Changelog updated
  Fixed renaming files which are not in main directory.
  Only use last name for auto completion in search bar. Fixes koppor#253
  Implemented issue #3229 (#3233)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants