Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BREAKING] Rename deleterows! to delete! #2189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2020
Merged

[BREAKING] Rename deleterows! to delete! #2189

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2020

Conversation

nalimilan
Copy link
Member

delete! was renamed to deletecols! a few releases ago, now it's time to finish the plan (#1514) and rename deleterows! to delete! for consistency with the rest of the API that treats data frames as collections of rows.

`delete!` was renamed to `deletecols!` a few releases ago, now it's time to
finish the plan and rename `deleterows!` to `delete!` for consistency with
the rest of the API that treats data frames as collections of rows.
@nalimilan nalimilan added the breaking The proposed change is breaking. label Apr 15, 2020
@nalimilan nalimilan added this to the 1.0 milestone Apr 15, 2020
@bkamins bkamins changed the title Rename deleterows! to delete! [BREAKING] Rename deleterows! to delete! Apr 15, 2020
Copy link
Member

@bkamins bkamins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. We could add support for Not here while we are redesigning this (but we do not have to so it is OK to leave this "as is")

@nalimilan
Copy link
Member Author

I'd rather leave that for later. ;-)

@nalimilan nalimilan merged commit eb6fc52 into master Apr 15, 2020
@nalimilan nalimilan deleted the nl/deleterows branch April 15, 2020 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking The proposed change is breaking.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants