We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This uncovered an issue in my code. But I guess it is actually a bug in the schema.
https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/blob/master/xsd/NeTEx_publication.xsd#L879
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Prefix netex as namespace of DistributionGroupRef
6860927
Fix #448
PR exists. Closed here.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Prefix netex as namespace of DistributionGroupRef (#449)
ff044de
* Prefix netex as namespace of DistributionGroupRef Fix #448 * try to fix the DistributionGroupRef * fixing * another thing to fix * another ref * Lint and update documentation tables * probably right, but marked now * Update xsd/NeTEx_publication.xsd * Update xsd/NeTEx_publication.xsd * Lint and update documentation tables * Update Netex_101.21_TfL_GeographicFares_UnitZone_MultipleProduct.xml * Update examples/functions/fares/Netex_101.21_TfL_GeographicFares_UnitZone_MultipleProduct.xml * Lint and update documentation tables * Update Netex_101.21_TfL_GeographicFares_UnitZone_MultipleProduct.xml * Update examples/functions/fares/Netex_101.21_TfL_GeographicFares_UnitZone_MultipleProduct.xml Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <stefan@konink.de> * Lint and update documentation tables * Update examples/functions/fares/Netex_101.21_TfL_GeographicFares_UnitZone_MultipleProduct.xml * fixing example * Lint and update documentation tables --------- Co-authored-by: Matthias Günter <matthias.guenter@sbb.ch> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
This uncovered an issue in my code. But I guess it is actually a bug in the schema.
https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/blob/master/xsd/NeTEx_publication.xsd#L879
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: