Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rss-glx: use xorg.* packages directly instead of xlibsWrapper #197797

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2022

Conversation

trofi
Copy link
Contributor

@trofi trofi commented Oct 25, 2022

Validated as no change in out outputs with diffoscope.

Description of changes
Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Validated as no change in `out` outputs with `diffoscope`.
@trofi
Copy link
Contributor Author

trofi commented Oct 25, 2022

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 197797 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • rss-glx

@trofi trofi merged commit 16c0450 into NixOS:master Oct 29, 2022
@trofi trofi deleted the rss-glx-without-xlibsWrapper branch October 29, 2022 07:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant