-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Boolean parameters not clearly highlighted #12546
Comments
Doesn't QGC show as 'Enabled/Disabled'? If so I'd go for that instead of True/False. And maybe turn it around: |
After #11318 I was planning on introducing a real boolean type at some point. |
@dagar Re "was planning on introducing a real boolean type at some point." - what sort of timeframe? I guess it makes no difference if I do this early. |
Could be sooner if it actually matters for anyone. I viewed it as a small optimization within the param system. What was your solution going to be @hamishwillee? Even shorter term as an incremental step we could probably "add" a boolean type that's still using a full int32 internally. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions. |
For me this is just a docs fix - I will do as Beat suggested here #12546 (comment). It is posted here because the generation tools are in this repo. Whether it is worth implementing it as a boolean is something for you guys (a separate issue). |
By example, consider COM_RC_OVERRIDE which is defined as a boolean:
However the rendering doesn't undersand that this is a boolean, and expects a max, min, interval in the left column and units in the right:
Proposal is to update rendering to make it obvious that a variable is a boolean. Open to ideas. @bkueng What do you recommend? Something like this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: