Adding VTOL Octoplane airframe type #12303
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 18, 2019
irsdkv
force-pushed
the
pr-standard_vtol_octo
branch
from
3d177bf to
0aadd80
Compare
irsdkv
force-pushed
the
pr-standard_vtol_octo
branch
from
0aadd80 to
532fe32
Compare
|
SITL Tests fail looks strange:
|
|
I think my main hesitation here is wanting to get a more appropriate name in place for VTOL standard (quadplane). |
|
Will squash and merge once done. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At this time some VTOLs could have 8 motors for MC mode.
I think that the ability to develop their support will be more convenient with the appropriate class.
Corresponding PR in User Guide: PX4/PX4-user_guide#503
Corresponding PR in Devguide: PX4/PX4-Devguide#818
Corresponding PR in QGroundcontrol: mavlink/qgroundcontrol#7537