-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cpu/efm32/periph: add DAC support for EFM32 Series 1 (VDAC) #19887
Conversation
72e19be
to
7eb20b3
Compare
7eb20b3
to
3283f34
Compare
19387: drivers/atwinc15x0: support dynamic scanning and connection to AP r=benpicco a=fabian18 19874: coap: add missing option numbers r=benpicco a=JKRhb 19875: coap: add missing Content-Format definitions r=benpicco a=JKRhb 19876: sys/net/ipv4/addr: fix typos r=benpicco a=Enoch247 ### Contribution description This patch fixes some typos in the doxygen doc. ### Testing procedure Nothing to test. No change to code. ### Issues/PRs references - None known 19878: makefiles/usb_board_reset.mk: declare term-delay target with test target r=benpicco a=aabadie 19886: cpu/efm32: fix DAC configuration r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description The EFM32 MCU allows the reference voltage to be configured per DAC device, not per DAC channel. Also, the DAC reference voltage was defined in the configuration but not used anywhere. At the moment we have only defined one board (`stwstk6220a`) that uses the DAC, so changing the configuration interface shouldn't be critical. ### Testing procedure `tests/periph/dac` should still work for the `stwstk6220a` ``` BOARD=slwstk6220a make -j8 -C tests/periph/dac flash ``` I don't have a `stwstk6220a` board (EFM32 Series 0) so that I can't test it. I could only test it for the `sltb009a` board (EFM32 Series 1) with the change for VDAC in PR #19887. ### Issues/PRs references 19888: boards/sltb009a: complete and fix documentation r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR completes and fixes the documentation which was still in the state as generated automatically by `efm2riot`. The PR also includes a fix of the configuration of the second UART device that was find out while completing the documentation. ### Testing procedure Green CI ### Issues/PRs references Co-authored-by: Fabian Hüßler <fabian.huessler@ml-pa.loc@MLPA-NB119.(none)> Co-authored-by: Fabian Hüßler <fabian.huessler@ml-pa.com> Co-authored-by: Jan Romann <jan.romann@hs-emden-leer.de> Co-authored-by: Joshua DeWeese <jdeweese@primecontrols.com> Co-authored-by: Alexandre Abadie <alexandre.abadie@inria.fr> Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
19886: cpu/efm32: fix DAC configuration r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description The EFM32 MCU allows the reference voltage to be configured per DAC device, not per DAC channel. Also, the DAC reference voltage was defined in the configuration but not used anywhere. At the moment we have only defined one board (`stwstk6220a`) that uses the DAC, so changing the configuration interface shouldn't be critical. ### Testing procedure `tests/periph/dac` should still work for the `stwstk6220a` ``` BOARD=slwstk6220a make -j8 -C tests/periph/dac flash ``` I don't have a `stwstk6220a` board (EFM32 Series 0) so that I can't test it. I could only test it for the `sltb009a` board (EFM32 Series 1) with the change for VDAC in PR #19887. ### Issues/PRs references 19892: pkg/tinydtls: allow to set buffer size from application again r=benpicco a=leandrolanzieri ### Contribution description Currently the buffer size on tinydtls is set in its Makefile whenever `gcoap` module is present. This limits the ability of the user to override the value. This adds a pre-check of the `CFLAGS` to see if it was set before. ### Testing procedure Try setting `CFLAGS += -DDTLS_MAX_BUF=<some_value>` on `examples/gcoap_dtls`, you should be able to override the default value without errors. ### Issues/PRs references Reported in #19838 Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net> Co-authored-by: Leandro Lanzieri <leandro.lanzieri@haw-hamburg.de>
19886: cpu/efm32: fix DAC configuration r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description The EFM32 MCU allows the reference voltage to be configured per DAC device, not per DAC channel. Also, the DAC reference voltage was defined in the configuration but not used anywhere. At the moment we have only defined one board (`stwstk6220a`) that uses the DAC, so changing the configuration interface shouldn't be critical. ### Testing procedure `tests/periph/dac` should still work for the `stwstk6220a` ``` BOARD=slwstk6220a make -j8 -C tests/periph/dac flash ``` I don't have a `stwstk6220a` board (EFM32 Series 0) so that I can't test it. I could only test it for the `sltb009a` board (EFM32 Series 1) with the change for VDAC in PR #19887. ### Issues/PRs references Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
19539: drivers/periph_sdmmc: define a High-level SDIO/SD/MMC API and low-level SDMMC periperal driver interface r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR provides a SDIO/SD/MMC Device API (SDMMC). It implements a SD host controller driver that provides a high-level functions using a low-level SDIO/SD/MMC peripheral driver for accessing - MultiMediaCards (MMC) and Embedded MultiMediaCards (eMMC) - SD Memory Cards (SD Cards) with Standard Capacity (SDSC), High Capacity (SDHC) or Extended Capacity (SDXC). It supports: - 1-bit, 4-bit and 8-bit data bus width - Default Speed and High Speed - Auto-CLK The SDIO/SD/MMC device API (SDMMC) is divided into two parts: 1. The high-level API that implements the SD Host Controller driver and allows - to inititialize and identify different types of cards, - to access them either blockwise or bytewise, - to get information about the used card, and - to send single commands or application specific commands to the card. 2. The low-level SDIO/SD/MMC peripheral driver implements the low-level functions required by the high-level device API. It has to be implemented for each MCU. ### Limitations: - Only one card per SDIO/SD/MMC device is supported. - eMMCs specific features are not supported. - UHS-I, UHS-II and UHS-III are not supported. ### Testing procedure PR #19540, PR #19760 or PR #19786 is needed to test this PR. ### Issues/PRs references Prerequisite for PR #19540 Prerequisite for PR #19760 Prerequisite for PR #19786 19815: cpu/sam0_common/periph/sdhc: busy waiting and clock fixes r=benpicco a=benpicco 19860: drivers/ft5x06: fix vendor ID for FT6xx6 and FTxxxx register addresses r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR provides a fix of the vendor ID for FT6xx6 touch panel driver ICs and a fix of register addresses for FTxxxx. According to the [Application Note for FT6x06 CTPM](https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/FT6x06_AN_public_ver0.1.3.pdf), the vendor ID of FT6x06 touch panel driver ICs is `0x11` instead of `0xcd`. Although there are no information found in the Web about the FT6x36, the FT6336U touch panel of a ESP32-S3 WT32 SC01 Plus is also working with `0x11` as vendor ID so that it seems that FT6x36 is also using `0x11` as vendor ID. Figured out with a `stm32f723e-disco` board (revision D03). Without this PR, `tests/drivers/ft5x06` gives: ``` +------------Initializing------------+ [ft5x06] init: invalid vendor ID: '0x11' (expected: 0xcd) [Error] Initialization failed ``` With this PR it works as expected. ``` +------------Initializing------------+ Initialization successful main(): This is RIOT! (Version: 2023.10-devel-96-gbb9011-drivers/ft5x06_fix_vendor_id) FT5x06 test application +------------Initializing------------+ [ft5x06] init: configuring touchscreen interrupt Initialization successful 1 touch detected [ft5x06] read gesture_id '0x00' Touch 1 - X: 151, Y:138 [ft5x06] read gesture_id '0x00' ``` Some background information found in the Web: - According to the [STM32CubeF7](https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeF7/blob/c20e6dd15bd2a90e19f28cadc703aeb26825d211/Drivers/BSP/STM32F723E-Discovery/stm32f723e_discovery_ts.c#L24-L27) the FRIDA LCD panel mounted on the `stm32f723e-disco` board either uses FT6x36 (prior revision D) or FT3x67 (revision D). However, the FT5x06 driver type for the card is defined as FT6x06, which does not seem correct: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/bb9011c3fbfe7c20bde99ce2462ef564d555ea08/boards/stm32f723e-disco/include/board.h#L59 - According to the [STM32CubeF7](https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeF7/blob/c20e6dd15bd2a90e19f28cadc703aeb26825d211/Drivers/BSP/Components/ft6x06/ft6x06.h#L269-L270), the vendor ID for FT6x36 should be `0xcd`. However, the FT6336U on ESP32-S3 WT32 SC01 Plus works with vendor ID `0x11`. - The [Adafruit FT6206 library](https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_FT6206_Library/blob/95118cd9831890616a1afb55d323b6261dee15af/Adafruit_FT6206.h#L28) uses `0x11` as vendor id. - The `stm32l496g-disco` board uses a FT6236 which has vendor ID `0xcd`. So the information available on the web is confusing. Maybe, a better solution would be to accept `0x11` as well as `0xcd` as vendor ID for FT6xxx touch panels. Unfortunately, there are no documents available on the registers directly from FocalTech 😟 so it seems to be more speculation than knowledge. ### Testing procedure ### Issues/PRs references 19886: cpu/efm32: fix DAC configuration r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description The EFM32 MCU allows the reference voltage to be configured per DAC device, not per DAC channel. Also, the DAC reference voltage was defined in the configuration but not used anywhere. At the moment we have only defined one board (`stwstk6220a`) that uses the DAC, so changing the configuration interface shouldn't be critical. ### Testing procedure `tests/periph/dac` should still work for the `stwstk6220a` ``` BOARD=slwstk6220a make -j8 -C tests/periph/dac flash ``` I don't have a `stwstk6220a` board (EFM32 Series 0) so that I can't test it. I could only test it for the `sltb009a` board (EFM32 Series 1) with the change for VDAC in PR #19887. ### Issues/PRs references Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net> Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
3283f34
to
de523ac
Compare
bors merge |
19887: cpu/efm32/periph: add DAC support for EFM32 Series 1 (VDAC) r=aabadie a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR provides a small change for `periph_dac` to support the VDACs of EFM32 Series 1 MCUs. It was tested with `sltb009a` board for which this PR includes the DAC configuration. ### Testing procedure `tests/periph/dac` should work for the `sltb009a` board. I've tested it already. ``` BOARD=sltb009a make -j8 -C tests/periph/dac flash ``` ### Issues/PRs references Depends on PR #19886 Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
Build failed: |
It seems other boards have to be adapted of something is missing. https://ci.riot-os.org/results/d24f504a91b54fb987d1606d97b9d409/output/builds/tests/drivers/bh1750/xg23-pk6068a:gnu.txt |
Hm 🤔 the board for which the compilation failed is a EFM32 Series 2 board for which the VDAC driver is not yet implemented. The problem seems to be that Maybe, EFM32 Series 2 VDACs also work with this PR. I don't have a EFM32 Series 2 board. Maybe @jue89 can help. |
@aabadie I fixed the compilation error by including |
please squash! |
53711fb
to
e04e8ee
Compare
Done |
bors merge |
Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
@aabadie Thanks for reviewing and merging 😄 |
Contribution description
This PR provides a small change for
periph_dac
to support the VDACs of EFM32 Series 1 MCUs. It was tested withsltb009a
board for which this PR includes the DAC configuration.Testing procedure
tests/periph/dac
should work for thesltb009a
board. I've tested it already.Issues/PRs references
Depends on PR #19886