Safe init: do not overwrite cert, key and config if present, close #400 #413
Conversation
scripts/first_time.rb
Outdated
| puts "Copying configuration settings over." | ||
| File.open("./config.json", "w") do |f| | ||
| f.write File.open("./config.json.defaults", "rb").read | ||
| if !File.exist?('cert.pem') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be checking if config.json exists, correct?
|
Thanks for pointing out the copy-paste error. I would suggest I fix this and force-push the branch so that it is only 1 commit (no pollution of commits after merge) and we do not have to create a new pr (would be kind of weird). I was told that force-pushing to pr branches is generally accepted, what is your opinion on this? |
|
I have no preference. I am good with you updating this PR or creating a new one. |
|
I've realized we also need a check to see if the config.json is unchanged from the git repo, if so overwrite it. Otherwise, new installs won't get the newest features from config.json.defaults. |
…rpicoProject#400 If either key or cert is missing, both are regenerated
schrnz
force-pushed
the
400_safe_init
branch
from
f8f74ad to
0214c1a
Compare
|
Updated the PR with the fixed version. Concerning updates: If we assume Talking about this, I just realized I did not know that the config is under versioning when I created this PR. It effectively defeats the whole purpose of this PR since the original idea was having a docker environment where you could have your config included via volume mount, which (I just realized) will still be overwritten by the git checkout even if this PR prevent the I mean the PR is still valid as the current implementation is inconsistent, and it solves the problem for the key and cert as well. However, the config problem is still there... But I guess we should discuss this in another issue/thread. |
Essentially, I just check whether the files exist. Concerning the SSL key and cert, I regenerate them if at least one is missing.