Writing flow: fix paste for input fields #61389
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ellatrix
added
[Type] Bug
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
ellatrix
commented
May 6, 2024
| const hasSelection = | ||
| event.type === 'copy' || event.type === 'cut' | ||
| ? documentHasUncollapsedSelection( ownerDocument ) | ||
| : documentHasSelection( ownerDocument ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I changed this line to documentHasSelection( ownerDocument ) && ! ownerDocument.activeElement.isContentEditable while also running it for the paste event as we did before #54543.
|
Size Change: +2 B (0%) Total Size: 1.75 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
Mamaduka
force-pushed
the
fix/paste-input-field
branch
from
4d43223 to
2c38d9d
Compare
Mamaduka
reviewed
May 8, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @ellatrix!
The fix works when manually testing the changes. The e2e tests are failing due to pasting not working; nothing gets pasted into the input field.
The embed block e2e test isn't a great place to test this regression. Embeddable URLs in paragraphs are auto-embedded. Let's add a separate test in writing flow specs for the RSS block.
// See: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/61389.
test( 'should retain native copy/paste behavior for input fields', async ( {
editor,
pageUtils,
} ) => {
await editor.insertBlock( { name: 'core/rss' } );
pageUtils.setClipboardData( {
plainText: 'https://developer.wordpress.org/news/feed/',
} );
await pageUtils.pressKeys( 'primary+v' );
await expect.poll( editor.getBlocks ).toMatchObject( [
{
name: 'core/rss',
attributes: {
feedURL: 'https://developer.wordpress.org/news/feed/',
},
},
] );
} );P.S. It seems your local trunk is a little behind. I had to rebase so I could switch between branches.
Mamaduka
reviewed
May 8, 2024
Comment on lines
308
to
311
| // Do not use `fill` here, it's not how the user interacts with the | ||
| // block. | ||
| this.#pageUtils.setClipboardData( { plainText: url } ); | ||
| await this.#pageUtils.pressKeys( 'primary+v' ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kevin940726 reminded me that this currently doesn't work on regular elements. See #55030.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm, interesting. I fixed it a bit differently here: 3bed7b6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kevin940726, do you mind having a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm afraid it's not that simple. It's a cross-browser and cross-os compatibility issue too. PR #55030 should work fine but it's too complicated to review. I haven't had the time to refactor it to a simpler form. I think it's okay to omit this change and just add the test.skip and a comment for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why skip? It actually tests a regression? Could you elaborate on why it's not that simple? Currently all our copy/paste tests are emulated and we manually fill in data, so how is this different?
This is a pretty bad regression, so we should get at least the fix in asap.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't mind merging this as is 👍. I just think that the test might not have good coverage after all if we're "designing" the test in a way that it should pass. I guess it's hard to argue against not having the test at all though 😆.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure I agree there. We're "designing" all copy/paste tests to pass then? We're actually manually emulating everything, this is no different? For example for copy/cut, we're manually setting a clipboard instead of the browser doing the default behaviour. The test assures that default behaviour is not prevented, and we emulate the default behaviour.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I think I chose the wrong words😅. I couldn't find a better word. What I mean is that for this particular use case, we might not want to intercept what Playwright already does. It's to prevent future breakage of our tests when the bundled browsers update. The more robust way might be to feature-detect it in our utils, but even that is hard to do right. I hope that this convo didn't sound discouraging or blaming! I'm just not sure what the best approach is at the time, but I'm positive that we can find one! ❤️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not at all! ❤️ Just saying I prefer to err on the side of adding a test, even if it's not perfect, but I'm open to your util changes as a follow-up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sounds good! I'll try to experiment with it some more another time 😅.
afercia
added
[Type] Regression
ellatrix
force-pushed
the
fix/paste-input-field
branch
from
2c38d9d to
3bed7b6
Compare
|
Flaky tests detected in 3bed7b6. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/9176157396
|
allilevine
approved these changes
May 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We've agreed that this fix should be merged ASAP, and it fixes the issue for me when manually testing. ✅
Screen.Recording.2024-05-24.at.10.18.59.AM.mov
fullofcaffeine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2024
Co-authored-by: ellatrix <ellatrix@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: Mamaduka <mamaduka@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: kevin940726 <kevin940726@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: allilevine <firewatch@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: afercia <afercia@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: liviopv <liviopv@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: t-hamano <wildworks@git.wordpress.org>
carstingaxion
pushed a commit
to carstingaxion/gutenberg
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
Co-authored-by: ellatrix <ellatrix@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: Mamaduka <mamaduka@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: kevin940726 <kevin940726@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: allilevine <firewatch@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: afercia <afercia@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: liviopv <liviopv@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: t-hamano <wildworks@git.wordpress.org>
patil-vipul
pushed a commit
to patil-vipul/gutenberg
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: ellatrix <ellatrix@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: Mamaduka <mamaduka@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: kevin940726 <kevin940726@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: allilevine <firewatch@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: afercia <afercia@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: liviopv <liviopv@git.wordpress.org> Co-authored-by: t-hamano <wildworks@git.wordpress.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Fixes #61377. I don't remember exactly why I removed this check for the paste event.
Why?
How?
Turns out I shouldn't have removed this condition for the paste event. We still don't want to handle paste for input and textarea elements, but we do want to override it for
contenteditable.Testing Instructions
Testing Instructions for Keyboard
Screenshots or screencast