-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
classification update #576
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks quite ok, a small but useful modification. Nice Fei.
redundant since we added it in pax (XENON1T/pax#576)
can you include more documentation (note or plot) showing the tuning you did here? |
* Created Lichen for Scienceun1. Updated AmBe FV. Created NG FV * Removed repeated definition * Fix for codacy errors This should fix the style errors found here: https://www.codacy.com/app/weiyuehuan/lax/pullRequest?prid=694964 * Another codacy fix Fix for remaining 3 errors here: https://www.codacy.com/app/tunnell/lax/pullRequest?prid=694950 . Hope this will fix all * Update sciencerun1.py Corrected wrong dependency of FiducialCylinder1T cut * Update SR0 AmBe to correct values * Update sciencerun1.py * remove SingleElectronS2 cut redundant since we added it in pax (XENON1T/pax#576) * fix style * Fix trailing whitespace * Fix more lint whitespace issues
That is how the boundary looks in PaxV6.6.5 (same procedure explained and used in https://xecluster.lngs.infn.it/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=xenon:xenon1t:analysis:firstresults:exploring_se_cut) |
This should be compared to "Cut v4_RvsAft" in Figure 2 of your note (which was used in SR0 lax)? But then they look very similar, i.e. shouldn't the curve drop from AFT 0.4 to 0.5 according to this PR?
Can you overlay the two? And then how about a plot of the change in |
@jhowl01 just pointed out that this has changed again in pax_v6.8.0:
Can we please get more documentation on this, i.e. the overlay plot requested above? |
Mis-identification of single electron S2 signals as S1 signal is a big contribution for the Lone-S1 rate in the detector, and significantly affect the accidental coincidence background.
A dedicated cut was defined by @MAVJ to reduce the probability of mis-identification. Instead of putting this cut in lax stage, we'd like to modify the peak classification in pax stage instead, which motivates this PR.
A minor modification of original cut is done to have slightly better acceptance for high AFT S1s (events happening on the top part of the TPC). Efficiency of this cut should be estimated together with other pax efficiency loss, such as this note