Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exciton ratio fix #251

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2024
Merged

Exciton ratio fix #251

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

HenningSE
Copy link
Collaborator

What does the code in this PR do / what does it improve?

This PR will exchange the number of excitons in the S1 timing simulation by the ratio of excitons to photons. It aims at solving #239. It is an alternative to #249.

@HenningSE HenningSE mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2024
5 tasks
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 26, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10106932456

Details

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.007%) to 80.051%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10053983233: 0.007%
Covered Lines: 2532
Relevant Lines: 3163

💛 - Coveralls

@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2024 06:57
@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego changed the title Exciton ratio fix v2 Exciton ratio fix Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, Henning, this is the cleanest approach. Let's see if in the future we want to be more flexible with this variable also for ERs.

@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego merged commit 5d69c9e into main Jul 26, 2024
4 checks passed
@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego deleted the exciton_fix_v2 branch July 26, 2024 07:50
@ramirezdiego ramirezdiego mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants