-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Utilise new Vendor name instead of adopt's patch with company name #1020
Comments
I have run an openjdk build (not adoptopenjdk build) using
and that results in a jdk with the following properties:
which looks like the result we want.
@karianna / @johnoliver - does that sound right or is there more to it than that? |
I would have thought that ideally we'd want |
can you paste in the full java -version string that gets produced. But assuming it give us what we need and removes a patch...sounds good |
Full output from
|
It looks like our existing patch sets this to AdoptOpenJDK, so we're being consistent. |
@lumpfish - I think you can go ahead and make the PR change (assuming this is a builds script change which I suspect it is). Worth co-ordinating with @johnoliver to then remove/disable our patch. |
Created #1461 for the --with-vendor-name part (not the patch removal). I don't think it's possible to test using my fork of openjdk-build in the Jenkins pipeline - @johnoliver / @sxa555 - please tell me if that's incorrect and I can test it. |
It is possible :-) Have initiated https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/build-scripts-pr-tester/job/test-build-script-pull-request/238/ to test it EDIT: I should probably have included an OpenJ9 version as well, but if you want to kick off another feel free - parameters are pretty self-explanatory |
Output of
from builds created from the openjdk-build fork / branch in PR #1461:
|
For reference, this are the system properties for the previous AdoptOpenJDK release:
|
#1461 is merged so this should be OK to close. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: