-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle 403 and 404 issues in FileResponse class #8538
Handle 403 and 404 issues in FileResponse class #8538
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8538 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.67% 97.68%
=======================================
Files 107 107
Lines 33288 33350 +62
Branches 3916 3918 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 32515 32578 +63
Misses 559 559
+ Partials 214 213 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on production HA instances. All good
Backport to 3.10: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found❌ Failed to cleanly apply 4f834b6 on top of patchback/backports/3.10/4f834b646c23f74962e181170a40d872e76f4602/pr-8538 Backporting merged PR #8538 into master
🤖 @patchback |
Thanks @steverep |
(cherry picked from commit 4f834b6) Co-authored-by: Steve Repsher <steverep@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4f834b6) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project.
@@ -690,10 +690,7 @@ def _resolve_path_to_response(self, unresolved_path: Path) -> StreamResponse: | |||
except PermissionError as error: | |||
raise HTTPForbidden() from error | |||
|
|||
# Not a regular file or does not exist. | |||
if not file_path.is_file(): | |||
raise HTTPNotFound() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This breaks some code in aiohttp-devtools:
https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp-devtools/blob/270aa58741b9aad268e32cb7bd755fda4c562731/aiohttp_devtools/runserver/serve.py#L404
Any suggestions on how to proceed?
What do these changes do?
is_file()
(i.e. exists and regular) to theFileResponse.prepare
method. Revamp tests for non-regular files to be more realistic and robust.hello_txt
test fixture which automatically now ensures compressed can exist without uncompressed variants.Are there changes in behavior for the user?
FileResponse
class is now more robust.Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?
No
Related issue number
Closes #8182
Checklist
CONTRIBUTORS.txt
CHANGES/
foldername it
<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst
(e.g.588.bugfix.rst
)if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request
number after creating the PR
.bugfix
: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed animproper undesired behavior that got corrected to match
pre-agreed expectations.
.feature
: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff..deprecation
: A declaration of future API removals and breakingchanges in behavior.
.breaking
: When something public is removed in a breaking way.Could be deprecated in an earlier release.
.doc
: Notable updates to the documentation structure or buildprocess.
.packaging
: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effectsand tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and
runtime assumptions.
.contrib
: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g.Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development
environment.
.misc
: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the abovecategories.
Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation,
for example:
Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood,
referring to what's changed compared to the last released version
of this project.