Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schema registry 4/N #1381

Merged
merged 138 commits into from
Apr 6, 2018
Merged

Schema registry 4/N #1381

merged 138 commits into from
Apr 6, 2018

Conversation

mgodave
Copy link
Contributor

@mgodave mgodave commented Mar 14, 2018

See #1137 for reference

Dave Rusek added 30 commits February 12, 2018 18:09
# Conflicts:
#	pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/nonpersistent/NonPersistentTopic.java
#	pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/common/api/Commands.java
Dave Rusek added 3 commits April 2, 2018 09:55
# Conflicts:
#	pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/ConsumerImpl.java
#	pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/common/api/Commands.java
Copy link
Contributor

@merlimat merlimat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@merlimat
Copy link
Contributor

merlimat commented Apr 2, 2018

@mgodave there's a file that's missing the license header: ProducerResponse.java

@merlimat
Copy link
Contributor

merlimat commented Apr 3, 2018

@mgodave please merge with master again and it should go through CI this time.

@merlimat
Copy link
Contributor

merlimat commented Apr 5, 2018

@mgodave there is a conflict with a change that went into master again, sorry.

I had changed getTopicReference() to return Optional<Topic>

@merlimat merlimat added the type/feature The PR added a new feature or issue requested a new feature label Apr 6, 2018
@merlimat merlimat added this to the 2.0.0-incubating milestone Apr 6, 2018
@sijie
Copy link
Member

sijie commented Apr 6, 2018

retest this please

@merlimat merlimat merged commit 1eb8068 into apache:master Apr 6, 2018
@mgodave mgodave deleted the schema-registry-4 branch April 9, 2018 15:32
codelipenghui pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
#16026)

Cherry-pick #15956.
### Motivation
Currently, we need admin permissions to operate the schema API. This is because the admin permission was defined when the schema API was first added. See #1381.
Later, then adding authentication granularity with #6428, we don't change the schema API part.  So leave the admin permission today.

But the binary protocol allows the produce/consume permission to get the schema, so change the related method permission to `produce/consume`.
nicoloboschi pushed a commit to datastax/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…#15956) (apache#16026)

Cherry-pick apache#15956.
### Motivation
Currently, we need admin permissions to operate the schema API. This is because the admin permission was defined when the schema API was first added. See apache#1381.
Later, then adding authentication granularity with apache#6428, we don't change the schema API part.  So leave the admin permission today.

But the binary protocol allows the produce/consume permission to get the schema, so change the related method permission to `produce/consume`.

(cherry picked from commit f3b4e86)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/feature The PR added a new feature or issue requested a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants