-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[improve][broker] Add fine-grain authorization to retention admin API #22163
Merged
Technoboy-
merged 3 commits into
apache:master
from
mattisonchao:improve/fine-grain-authz-retention
Feb 29, 2024
Merged
[improve][broker] Add fine-grain authorization to retention admin API #22163
Technoboy-
merged 3 commits into
apache:master
from
mattisonchao:improve/fine-grain-authz-retention
Feb 29, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add fine-grain authorization to retention admin API so that it can be controlled at a more fine-grain level. - Update getRetention, add PolicyName.RETENTION with READ check - Update setRetention & removeRetention, add PolicyName.RETENTION with WRITE check
mattisonchao
requested review from
lhotari,
Technoboy-,
eolivelli and
codelipenghui
February 29, 2024 08:22
lhotari
approved these changes
Feb 29, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Good work @mattisonchao
Technoboy-
approved these changes
Feb 29, 2024
dao-jun
approved these changes
Feb 29, 2024
@mattisonchao We have a conflict in branch-3.0. can you help to cherry-pick this to branch-3.0? |
mukesh-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2024
…apache#22163) (cherry picked from commit 6ec473e) (cherry picked from commit 4f2e4c8)
mattisonchao
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2024
mukesh-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
…apache#22163) (cherry picked from commit 6ec473e) (cherry picked from commit 4f2e4c8)
nikhil-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
…apache#22163) (cherry picked from commit 6ec473e) (cherry picked from commit 0256117)
nikhil-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 4b5dba7)
nikhil-ctds
added a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
4 tasks
nikhil-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
…apache#22163) (cherry picked from commit 6ec473e) (cherry picked from commit 0256117)
nikhil-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 4b5dba7)
nikhil-ctds
added a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Add fine-grain authorization to retention admin API so that it can be controlled at a more fine-grain level.
Modifications
Verifying this change
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
Documentation
doc-not-needed