-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: (strf-8625) support Node 12.x #645
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
v10.16.3 | ||
v12.18.4 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ addons: | |||
ssh_known_hosts: | ||||
- github.com | ||||
node_js: | ||||
- 10 | ||||
- 10.22.1 | ||||
- 12.18.4 | ||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We also need to update appveyor Line 3 in e0b6387
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I did it, it should be visible in https://github.com/bigcommerce/stencil-cli/pull/645/files |
||||
|
||||
cache: | ||||
directories: | ||||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | ||
environment: | ||
matrix: | ||
- nodejs_version: "10" | ||
- nodejs_version: "12" | ||
platform: | ||
- x86 | ||
- x64 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should support 10 as well until EOL for node 10 or should we switch over support to 12 only
@bookernath thoughts ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should take into account that there are some dependencies (esp. related to hapi) that have last versions already not supporting node 10
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Decided that we should support node 10 too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MaxGenash lets keep node 10 for now since it is an LTS version. We will drop it next year.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok.
@junedkazi also just for curiosity tried node 14, but unfortunately, our old version of node-sass doesn’t work with it :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes since we are on a forked version of node-sass we have not compiled a node 14 binary for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, got it