Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update validate feature error message #1091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

michelleN
Copy link
Contributor

  • Adds list of valid features to error message

+ Adds list of valid features to error message

Signed-off-by: Michelle Dhanani <michelle@fermyon.com>
Copy link
Member

@alexcrichton alexcrichton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

I think it might be good to add a test as well for this ideally to see how it changes over time, and I think that can be done by adding tests/cli/bad-feature.wat which would contain something like:

;; RUN: validate --features bad-name

(module)

and then BLESS=1 cargo test --test cli should create tests/cli/bad-feature.wat.stderr.

Although ok actually after I wrote this up I checked tests/cli.rs and it asserts that all command executions succeed, so scratch all that adding tests for this would require deeper refactoring, so no need to happen now.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton merged commit 0263c2f into bytecodealliance:main Jun 28, 2023
@michelleN michelleN deleted the validfeatures branch June 28, 2023 15:58
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/wasm-tools that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2023
Releases recent changes such as:

* More support for the gc proposal. bytecodealliance#1045 bytecodealliance#1059
* Support for resources throughout most tooling. bytecodealliance#1053 bytecodealliance#1068 bytecodealliance#1070 bytecodealliance#1082
  bytecodealliance#1079 bytecodealliance#1083 bytecodealliance#1084 bytecodealliance#1105 bytecodealliance#1113 bytecodealliance#1116
* Support for `include` in WIT files. bytecodealliance#1054 bytecodealliance#1085 bytecodealliance#1088
* WIT worlds may now be rejected if the same interface can be "reached"
  as both an import and an export simultaneously. bytecodealliance#1081 bytecodealliance#1107
* Support for registry metadata in `wasm-tools metadata`. bytecodealliance#1060
* A new subcommand `wasm-tools component targets`. bytecodealliance#1089
* An `--out-dir` argument is supported on `wasm-tools component wit` to
  print the entire `Resolve` instead of just one package. bytecodealliance#1108
* Miscellaneous bug fixes and improvements. bytecodealliance#1061 bytecodealliance#1065 bytecodealliance#1074 bytecodealliance#1073 bytecodealliance#1078 bytecodealliance#1077
  bytecodealliance#1072 bytecodealliance#1086 bytecodealliance#1091 bytecodealliance#1094 bytecodealliance#1114 bytecodealliance#1106
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/wasm-tools that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2023
Releases recent changes such as:

* More support for the gc proposal.
  [bytecodealliance#1045](bytecodealliance#1045)
  [bytecodealliance#1059](bytecodealliance#1059)
* Support for resources throughout most tooling.
  [bytecodealliance#1053](bytecodealliance#1053)
  [bytecodealliance#1068](bytecodealliance#1068)
  [bytecodealliance#1070](bytecodealliance#1070)
  [bytecodealliance#1082](bytecodealliance#1082)
  [bytecodealliance#1079](bytecodealliance#1079)
  [bytecodealliance#1083](bytecodealliance#1083)
  [bytecodealliance#1084](bytecodealliance#1084)
  [bytecodealliance#1105](bytecodealliance#1105)
  [bytecodealliance#1113](bytecodealliance#1113)
  [bytecodealliance#1116](bytecodealliance#1116)
* Support for `include` in WIT files.
  [bytecodealliance#1054](bytecodealliance#1054)
  [bytecodealliance#1085](bytecodealliance#1085)
  [bytecodealliance#1088](bytecodealliance#1088)
* WIT worlds may now be rejected if the same interface can be "reached"
  as both an import and an export simultaneously.
  [bytecodealliance#1081](bytecodealliance#1081)
  [bytecodealliance#1107](bytecodealliance#1107)
* Support for registry metadata in `wasm-tools metadata`.
  [bytecodealliance#1060](bytecodealliance#1060)
* A new subcommand `wasm-tools component targets`.
  [bytecodealliance#1089](bytecodealliance#1089)
* An `--out-dir` argument is supported on `wasm-tools component wit` to
  print the entire `Resolve` instead of just one package.
  [bytecodealliance#1108](bytecodealliance#1108)
* Miscellaneous bug fixes and improvements.
  [bytecodealliance#1061](bytecodealliance#1061)
  [bytecodealliance#1065](bytecodealliance#1065)
  [bytecodealliance#1074](bytecodealliance#1074)
  [bytecodealliance#1073](bytecodealliance#1073)
  [bytecodealliance#1078](bytecodealliance#1078)
  [bytecodealliance#1077](bytecodealliance#1077)
  [bytecodealliance#1072](bytecodealliance#1072)
  [bytecodealliance#1086](bytecodealliance#1086)
  [bytecodealliance#1091](bytecodealliance#1091)
  [bytecodealliance#1094](bytecodealliance#1094)
  [bytecodealliance#1114](bytecodealliance#1114)
  [bytecodealliance#1106](bytecodealliance#1106)
alexcrichton added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2023
Releases recent changes such as:

* More support for the gc proposal.
  [#1045](#1045)
  [#1059](#1059)
* Support for resources throughout most tooling.
  [#1053](#1053)
  [#1068](#1068)
  [#1070](#1070)
  [#1082](#1082)
  [#1079](#1079)
  [#1083](#1083)
  [#1084](#1084)
  [#1105](#1105)
  [#1113](#1113)
  [#1116](#1116)
* Support for `include` in WIT files.
  [#1054](#1054)
  [#1085](#1085)
  [#1088](#1088)
* WIT worlds may now be rejected if the same interface can be "reached"
  as both an import and an export simultaneously.
  [#1081](#1081)
  [#1107](#1107)
* Support for registry metadata in `wasm-tools metadata`.
  [#1060](#1060)
* A new subcommand `wasm-tools component targets`.
  [#1089](#1089)
* An `--out-dir` argument is supported on `wasm-tools component wit` to
  print the entire `Resolve` instead of just one package.
  [#1108](#1108)
* Miscellaneous bug fixes and improvements.
  [#1061](#1061)
  [#1065](#1065)
  [#1074](#1074)
  [#1073](#1073)
  [#1078](#1078)
  [#1077](#1077)
  [#1072](#1072)
  [#1086](#1086)
  [#1091](#1091)
  [#1094](#1094)
  [#1114](#1114)
  [#1106](#1106)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants