-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump prerelease pointers #259
Conversation
A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files. References: * ucoProject/UCO#563 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References: * ucoProject/UCO#563 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
No effects were observed on Make-managed files. References: * ucoProject/UCO#543 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files. References: * ucoProject/UCO#562 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References: * ucoProject/UCO#562 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
I'm fine with this merging once CI passes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest to improve the documentation and assure that each triple's Subject is provided with one of the textual properties (sh:message, rdfs:comment, rdfs:seeAlso, ...), providing some description of the Subject. For instance, lines 1034-1041 specify the datatype-objects shape, but I need to read the code to understand its working.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair feedback! I'm porting it over to UCO Issue 562.
No description provided.