-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fix the cancel unbond #12967
fix: fix the cancel unbond #12967
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12967 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 55.84% 55.68% -0.16%
==========================================
Files 649 644 -5
Lines 55022 54935 -87
==========================================
- Hits 30726 30591 -135
- Misses 21822 21878 +56
+ Partials 2474 2466 -8
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good, except few doubts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gsk967 can you recheck the logic at store migration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the solution, good work. Will make a more thorough review tomorrow.
@@ -130,8 +130,27 @@ func NewUnbondingDelegation( | |||
|
|||
// AddEntry - append entry to the unbonding delegation | |||
func (ubd *UnbondingDelegation) AddEntry(creationHeight int64, minTime time.Time, balance math.Int) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's add a unit test for this function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logic looks good to me, but let's add a unit test for AddEntry
before merging.
A nice to have would be a migration test, but not blocking.
@@ -130,8 +130,27 @@ func NewUnbondingDelegation( | |||
|
|||
// AddEntry - append entry to the unbonding delegation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's update this godoc too
@AmauryM I added store migrations and tests, can you please look into those changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, few nits(mostly spell checks) & Amaury's comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just pending latest naming nits
Description
This pull request contains the fix regarding cancel unbonding delegations
It will remove duplicate ubdEntries which have same
creation_height
and create new ubdEntry with updatedbalance
andinitial_balance
Closes: #12931
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change