Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(auth): use collections for Account state management #16016

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
May 26, 2023

Conversation

testinginprod
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
if err := cdc.UnmarshalInterface(iterator.Value(), &acc); err != nil {
return err
}
store.Set(types.AccountNumberStoreKey(acc.GetAccountNumber()), acc.GetAddress().Bytes())
store.Set(accountNumberStoreKey(acc.GetAccountNumber()), acc.GetAddress().Bytes())

Check warning

Code scanning / gosec

Errors unhandled.

Errors unhandled.
@testinginprod testinginprod marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2023 09:23
@testinginprod testinginprod requested a review from a team as a code owner May 11, 2023 09:23
@github-prbot github-prbot requested review from a team, aaronc and alexanderbez and removed request for a team May 11, 2023 09:26
@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

seems like ci is still broken?

@testinginprod testinginprod enabled auto-merge May 22, 2023 16:16
@testinginprod testinginprod mentioned this pull request May 22, 2023
62 tasks
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ func TestSetPubKey(t *testing.T) {
// set accounts and create msg for each address
for i, addr := range addrs {
acc := suite.accountKeeper.NewAccountWithAddress(suite.ctx, addr)
require.NoError(t, acc.SetAccountNumber(uint64(i)))
require.NoError(t, acc.SetAccountNumber(uint64(i+1000)))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we open an issue to redo these tests to avoid this overwriting?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TBH, considering we're creating a new auth & accounts module I think we can leave things as is in x/auth assuming no more huge extra features will be put here.

Copy link
Member

@tac0turtle tac0turtle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@testinginprod testinginprod added this pull request to the merge queue May 26, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3d15f9e May 26, 2023
@testinginprod testinginprod deleted the tip/coll/auth_accounts_3 branch May 26, 2023 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants