-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: changed the data type for FeePayer and FeeGranter #16272
Conversation
Thanks for your contribution @vishal-kanna! This issue is specifically related to #15284, so it was intended to be addressed after that is merged. I don't think it makes as much sense before this. Would you be interested in retackling this after #15284 gets merged? |
Hey @vishal-kanna, seems like the dependant PR got merged, you can resume your work. |
Can you also check the failing tests & and add a changelog entry? |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Looks like we'll need someone to take over this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just a nit. Otherwise lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
x/auth/tx/direct_aux.go
Outdated
feePayer := protoTx.FeePayer() | ||
payer := protoTx.FeePayer() | ||
|
||
feepayer := sdk.AccAddress(payer) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: for simplicity, we could just do sdk.AccAddress(payer).String()
below and revert the variable change above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Co-authored-by: atheeshp <59333759+atheeshp@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Likhita Polavarapu <78951027+likhita-809@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 8003261)
…) (#16920) Co-authored-by: Vishal Potpelliwar <71565171+vishal-kanna@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
Closes: #16183
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change