-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: remove header type from NewContext #17426
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How often we need to pass a chain id? Looks like in most tests it isn't necessary.
Should we not use .WithChainID
instead and remove it from the constructor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, pending nits from @julienrbrt
@@ -156,6 +159,9 @@ func (c Context) WithBlockHeader(header cmtproto.Header) Context { | |||
// https://github.com/gogo/protobuf/issues/519 | |||
header.Time = header.Time.UTC() | |||
c.header = header | |||
|
|||
// when calling withBlockheader on a new context chainID in the struct is empty | |||
c.chainID = header.ChainID |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we expect WithChainID
to have the same behavior? (Set the chainID to the header?).
Currently in all SDK versions, it does not do it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tbh this is weird, the chainID is in the header and on the struct, but they werent updated together, I think this is two bugs, first storing it twice second not updating or checking the other when updating one of them
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, I think this is a valid fix of WithBlockHeader
/ WithChainID
that we can add to in least v0.50
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
Description
ref #17425
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
make lint
andmake test
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change