Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nit(transfer): rename private functions for coin/token consistency. #6446

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim commented Jun 3, 2024

Description

remember seeing this in Colin's original PR which was closed, adding it to close relevant issue.

closes: #6379


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated terminology from Token to Coin for better clarity and consistency in token handling functions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in relay.go focus on renaming functions to ensure consistent terminology by replacing Token with Coin. The functions escrowToken and unescrowToken are now escrowCoin and unescrowCoin, respectively, and they operate on sdk.Coin instead of sdk.Token.

Changes

Files Change Summary
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go Renamed escrowToken to escrowCoin and unescrowToken to unescrowCoin. Updated function parameters to use sdk.Coin instead of sdk.Token.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Sender
    participant Keeper
    participant EscrowAccount

    Sender->>Keeper: Call escrowCoin(ctx, sender, escrowAddress, coin)
    Keeper->>EscrowAccount: Transfer coin to escrow account
    EscrowAccount-->>Keeper: Acknowledge receipt
    Keeper-->>Sender: Return success/error

    participant Receiver
    Sender->>Keeper: Call unescrowCoin(ctx, escrowAddress, receiver, coin)
    Keeper->>EscrowAccount: Retrieve coin from escrow account
    EscrowAccount-->>Keeper: Confirm retrieval
    Keeper->>Receiver: Transfer coin to receiver
    Receiver-->>Keeper: Acknowledge receipt
    Keeper-->>Sender: Return success/error
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Consistent terminology for coin/token in transfer (#6379)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7068760 and cb40d8c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

golangci-lint
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go

55-55: undefined: Keeper


164-164: undefined: Keeper


304-304: undefined: Keeper


319-319: undefined: Keeper


327-327: undefined: Keeper


371-371: undefined: Keeper


387-387: undefined: Keeper


405-405: undefined: Keeper

Additional comments not posted (4)
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go (4)

371-371: Rename functions to align with consistent terminology.

The renaming of escrowToken to escrowCoin and unescrowToken to unescrowCoin aligns with the PR's goal of consistent terminology. Good job on maintaining clarity in the codebase.

Also applies to: 387-387

Tools
golangci-lint

371-371: undefined: Keeper


103-103: Ensure proper error handling for escrowCoin.

Verification successful

The escrowCoin function is called with error handling in the relay.go file. The instances found are:

  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go: if err := k.escrowCoin(ctx, sender, escrowAddress, coin); err != nil {

This indicates that the error handling for escrowCoin is properly implemented.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper error handling for `escrowCoin` function calls.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences.
rg --type go $'escrowCoin'

Length of output: 937


212-212: Ensure proper error handling for unescrowCoin.

Verification successful

The rg command output shows that the unescrowCoin function is called twice in modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go, both times within an error handling construct. The other two occurrences are a comment and the function definition, which do not require error handling.

  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go: if err := k.unescrowCoin(ctx, escrowAddress, receiver, coin); err != nil {
  • modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go: if err := k.unescrowCoin(ctx, escrowAddress, sender, coin); err != nil {

Both calls to unescrowCoin are properly wrapped in error handling constructs.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper error handling for `unescrowCoin` function calls.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences.
rg --type go $'unescrowCoin'

Length of output: 546


346-346: Ensure proper error handling for unescrowCoin.

Verification successful

The unescrowCoin function is called twice in modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go, and both instances appear to handle errors by checking if err is not nil. To ensure proper error handling, we need to examine the surrounding code to confirm that the errors are managed correctly.


The context around the calls to unescrowCoin in modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go shows that errors are being checked and handled appropriately. Specifically, if an error occurs, it is returned immediately, ensuring that any issues are propagated correctly.

  • The first call to unescrowCoin checks if the receiver's address is blocked and handles the error by returning it.
  • The second call to unescrowCoin is within a conditional block and also returns the error if one occurs.

Both instances demonstrate proper error handling.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper error handling for `unescrowCoin` function calls.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences.
rg --type go $'unescrowCoin'

Length of output: 546



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the context around `unescrowCoin` function calls to ensure proper error handling.

# Extract 5 lines before and after each call to `unescrowCoin` to check error handling.
rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'unescrowCoin' modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go

Length of output: 1696

Copy link
Contributor

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed for 'ibc-go'

Issues
12 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim merged commit 6141162 into main Jun 3, 2024
76 checks passed
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim deleted the jim/rename-final-token-coin-inconsistencies branch June 3, 2024 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consistent terminology for coin/token in transfer.
3 participants