-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 580
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nit(transfer): rename private functions for coin/token consistency. #6446
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant Sender
participant Keeper
participant EscrowAccount
Sender->>Keeper: Call escrowCoin(ctx, sender, escrowAddress, coin)
Keeper->>EscrowAccount: Transfer coin to escrow account
EscrowAccount-->>Keeper: Acknowledge receipt
Keeper-->>Sender: Return success/error
participant Receiver
Sender->>Keeper: Call unescrowCoin(ctx, escrowAddress, receiver, coin)
Keeper->>EscrowAccount: Retrieve coin from escrow account
EscrowAccount-->>Keeper: Confirm retrieval
Keeper->>Receiver: Transfer coin to receiver
Receiver-->>Keeper: Acknowledge receipt
Keeper-->>Sender: Return success/error
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
golangci-lint
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go
55-55: undefined: Keeper
164-164: undefined: Keeper
304-304: undefined: Keeper
319-319: undefined: Keeper
327-327: undefined: Keeper
371-371: undefined: Keeper
387-387: undefined: Keeper
405-405: undefined: Keeper
Additional comments not posted (4)
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go (4)
371-371
: Rename functions to align with consistent terminology.The renaming of
escrowToken
toescrowCoin
andunescrowToken
tounescrowCoin
aligns with the PR's goal of consistent terminology. Good job on maintaining clarity in the codebase.Also applies to: 387-387
Tools
golangci-lint
371-371: undefined: Keeper
103-103
: Ensure proper error handling forescrowCoin
.Verification successful
The
escrowCoin
function is called with error handling in therelay.go
file. The instances found are:
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go: if err := k.escrowCoin(ctx, sender, escrowAddress, coin); err != nil {
This indicates that the error handling for
escrowCoin
is properly implemented.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper error handling for `escrowCoin` function calls. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences. rg --type go $'escrowCoin'Length of output: 937
212-212
: Ensure proper error handling forunescrowCoin
.Verification successful
The
rg
command output shows that theunescrowCoin
function is called twice inmodules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go
, both times within an error handling construct. The other two occurrences are a comment and the function definition, which do not require error handling.
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go: if err := k.unescrowCoin(ctx, escrowAddress, receiver, coin); err != nil {
modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go: if err := k.unescrowCoin(ctx, escrowAddress, sender, coin); err != nil {
Both calls to
unescrowCoin
are properly wrapped in error handling constructs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper error handling for `unescrowCoin` function calls. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences. rg --type go $'unescrowCoin'Length of output: 546
346-346
: Ensure proper error handling forunescrowCoin
.Verification successful
The
unescrowCoin
function is called twice inmodules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go
, and both instances appear to handle errors by checking iferr
is not nil. To ensure proper error handling, we need to examine the surrounding code to confirm that the errors are managed correctly.
The context around the calls to
unescrowCoin
inmodules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.go
shows that errors are being checked and handled appropriately. Specifically, if an error occurs, it is returned immediately, ensuring that any issues are propagated correctly.
- The first call to
unescrowCoin
checks if the receiver's address is blocked and handles the error by returning it.- The second call to
unescrowCoin
is within a conditional block and also returns the error if one occurs.Both instances demonstrate proper error handling.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify proper error handling for `unescrowCoin` function calls. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences. rg --type go $'unescrowCoin'Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context around `unescrowCoin` function calls to ensure proper error handling. # Extract 5 lines before and after each call to `unescrowCoin` to check error handling. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'unescrowCoin' modules/apps/transfer/keeper/relay.goLength of output: 1696
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice.
Quality Gate passed for 'ibc-go'Issues Measures |
Description
remember seeing this in Colin's original PR which was closed, adding it to close relevant issue.
closes: #6379
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the GitHub PR explorer.SonarCloud Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.Summary by CodeRabbit
Token
toCoin
for better clarity and consistency in token handling functions.