Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove kwargs everywhere #66

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

gwaybio
Copy link
Member

@gwaybio gwaybio commented Dec 20, 2019

in #58 I removed kwargs in feature_select(). This PR removes all kwargs

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #66 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #66      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.26%   97.25%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        1718     1710       -8     
==========================================
- Hits         1671     1663       -8     
  Misses         47       47
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pycytominer/tests/test_annotate.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
pycytominer/annotate.py 60% <ø> (-3.64%) ⬇️
pycytominer/tests/test_normalize.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
pycytominer/aggregate.py 96.33% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
pycytominer/feature_select.py 90.47% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
pycytominer/tests/test_aggregate_profiles.py 99.01% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
pycytominer/normalize.py 93.93% <100%> (-0.66%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b915ea9...0dd48ca. Read the comment docs.

@gwaybio gwaybio merged commit c742260 into cytomining:master Dec 20, 2019
@gwaybio gwaybio deleted the remove-kwargs branch December 20, 2019 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants