Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Streamline local dev process with hot reloading, Dockerfile.dev updates, and resolved fixtures #1809

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

aaronkanzer
Copy link
Member

@aaronkanzer aaronkanzer commented Jan 11, 2024

Relates to:

lincbrain#27

Builds upon:

Cc @kabilar

lincbrain#26

Cc @yarikoptic @waxlamp

#1722

Purpose:

For the LINC project -- @kabilar and I have been trying to improve the development process. This PR introduces a simple bash script for local setup, hot-reloading on the frontend, and improved fixtures instantiation.

For the fixtures improvements:

• A minor modification is made to ensure that a User object is created if not found -- this sometimes passed; however, sometimes it did not due to the presence of past data in Postgres being present (especially when switching back-and-forth from linc-archive to dandi-archive) This addition is fairly benign in my opinion

• Extending from #1722, it was observed that validation failed initially upon the creation of an AssetBlob, as with the SimpleUploadedFile as a non-zarr asset, validation fails without a sha_256 initially provided. See the error message below that results from prior these changes

[20:14:42] INFO     Found AssetBlob c000611b-2d6c-4931-b0ec-44855ec1d379                                                                                        __init__.py:21
           INFO     Validating asset metadata for asset 1                                                                                                       __init__.py:40
           INFO     Error while validating asset 1 [{'loc': ('digest',), 'msg': 'A non-zarr asset must have a sha2_256.', 'type': 'value_error'}]               __init__.py:57
           INFO     Validating dandiset metadata for version 1                                                                                                 __init__.py:125
           INFO     Successfully validated version 1    

@aaronkanzer aaronkanzer changed the title Draft: Streamline local dev process with hot reloading, docker, and resolved fixtures Streamline local dev process with hot reloading, Dockerfile updates, and resolved fixtures Jan 11, 2024
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"name": "dandi-archive",
"version": "0.0.0",
"scripts": {
"dev": "vite",
"dev": "vite --host 0.0.0.0",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

--host 0.0.0.0 is explicitly required here for Docker to bind to localhost appropriately (for local dev)

@aaronkanzer
Copy link
Member Author

aaronkanzer commented Jan 11, 2024

Cc @mvandenburgh -- just tagging you here to get your thoughts/opinions -- this setup is just something we have found convenience with for the linc-archive fork, but if you have future plans/better ideas, let us know. I noticed all of your frontend improvements regarding vite builds in the end of 2023 😃

@aaronkanzer aaronkanzer changed the title Streamline local dev process with hot reloading, Dockerfile updates, and resolved fixtures Streamline local dev process with hot reloading, Dockerfile.dev updates, and resolved fixtures Jan 11, 2024
@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

I know that it was not reviewed yet but conflicts already came up so might be good to rebase @aaronkanzer

@@ -123,4 +123,5 @@ dmypy.json
# End of https://www.gitignore.io/api/django

# Editor settings
.vscode
.vscode
.idea/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably would be good to keep them sorted (since no order effects unless we start adding some !) and that might help to avoid conflicts in some cases at least (in comparison to just adding at the end all the time)

# Happy developing!

if [ $# -lt 2 ]; then
echo "Usage: $0 <image_name> <your.email@email.com>"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please checkout #1828 . If agree -- may be

  • make email optional here and if not specified - use that git config user.email
  • in instructions above - do not make users specify it.

2. Access the site, starting at http://localhost:8000/admin/
3. When finished, use `Ctrl+C`
1. Ensure you have installed Docker on your local machine
2. Run `./admin_dev_startup.sh <fun-image-name-you-can-pick> <your-email>`. When prompted, enter an username and password in the command prompt. (If you run into local errors with the script, you may need to run `chmod +x admin_dev_startup.sh` first)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because these are DEVELOPMENT (not DEPLOYMENT) instructions, I like when I could just copy/paste instructions. What about smth like

Suggested change
2. Run `./admin_dev_startup.sh <fun-image-name-you-can-pick> <your-email>`. When prompted, enter an username and password in the command prompt. (If you run into local errors with the script, you may need to run `chmod +x admin_dev_startup.sh` first)
2. Run `./admin_dev_startup.sh EXAMPLE myemail@example.com` (replace arguments with more appropriate if desired). When prompted, enter an username and password in the command prompt.

I also removed chmod hint -- must not be necessary if you give executable bit to that file in git.

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
#!/bin/bash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

chmod +x admin_dev_startup.sh; git add admin_dev_startup.sh; git commit -m 'Make script executable' admin_dev_startup.sh

?

echo "Usage: $0 <image_name> <your.email@email.com>"
exit 1
fi

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# Fail as early as any error or any undefined variable
set -eu

cd web/

# Build Docker image (include the path to the Dockerfile's context)
docker build -t $image_name -f Dockerfile.dev .
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
docker build -t $image_name -f Dockerfile.dev .
docker build -t "$image_name" -f Dockerfile.dev .

run shellcheck on this script please to not give surprises to people e.g. with spaces in their paths

@aaronkanzer
Copy link
Member Author

@yarikoptic thanks for the review here -- I'm navigating over in the Terraform land, so I might not get back to this for a few days -- many thanks in the meantime though

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

since there seems to be no other shell script in this repo I would not introduce shellcheck workflow here, but here is the script with which I would have done it: https://github.com/yarikoptic/improveit/blob/main/shellcheckit ;-)

3. When finished, use `Ctrl+C`
1. Ensure you have installed Docker on your local machine
2. Run `./admin_dev_startup.sh <fun-image-name-you-can-pick> <your-email>`. When prompted, enter an username and password in the command prompt. (If you run into local errors with the script, you may need to run `chmod +x admin_dev_startup.sh` first)
3. If not routed to `localhost:8000` upon clicking `LOG IN WITH GITHUB` (If routed appropriately, just log in), navigate to `localhost:8000/admin`, and log in with the username and password you used in Step #2. Under the `User` section, select the username and change the `Status` from `Incomplete` to `Approved`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This workaround is actually needed due to a bug, which will be solved by #1113. Once that's merged, this won't be needed.

Comment on lines +19 to +31
# Run the Docker container for frontend in background
docker run -d -v "$(pwd):/usr/src/app" -v /usr/src/app/node_modules -p 8085:8085 -e CHOKIDAR_USEPOLLING=true $image_name

cd ..

# Run Docker Compose commands for backend
docker compose run --rm django ./manage.py migrate
docker compose run --rm django ./manage.py createcachetable
docker compose run --rm django ./manage.py createsuperuser
docker compose run --rm django ./manage.py create_dev_dandiset --owner $email

# Bring backend application to life!
docker compose up
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Docker-izing the front end application is nice, I think that's definitely a worthwhile change to make. But, I think adding it as another service in the docker-compose.override.yml would be a better place for it. Starting it with docker run means that the user then has to manually stop it, and can't rely on docker compose down/stop to stop the container.

Comment on lines +19 to +26
@click.option('--first_name', default='Randi The Admin')
@click.option('--last_name', default='Dandi')
def create_dev_dandiset(name: str, email: str, first_name: str, last_name: str):
owner, is_created = User.objects.get_or_create(email=email)
if not is_created:
owner.first_name = first_name
owner.last_name = last_name
owner.save()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The intent of this script is for it to be run after manage.py createsuperuser. In the spirit of keeping the original scope of the script (i.e., creating a single dandiset with an asset, not any users), my preference would be to leave this as-is and not add additional logic for creating users.

docker compose run --rm django ./manage.py create_dev_dandiset --owner $email

# Bring backend application to life!
docker compose up
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This script is nice, but I disagree that we should make it the default way to start a dev environment for a couple reasons -

  1. It abstracts away too much. For example, I think running DB migrations should be an intentional and explicit action on the part of the developer. There are some cases in development where one may want to hold off on running existing migrations, or only run a subset of migrations.
  2. I think it's fairly common to want to run the frontend server natively and all the backend services in Docker, particularly when doing frontend-only development.

Comment on lines +44 to +46
# Since the SimpleUploadedFile is non-zarr asset, validation fails
# without a sha2_256 initially provided.
sha256_hash = hashlib.sha256(file_content).hexdigest()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can confirm this fixes the validation failure for me locally 👍

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

@mvandenburgh thanks for the review! I think it is still worth reincarnating this PR and a developer helper, WDYT @aaronkanzer , would you be able to resolve conflicts and reflect on @mvandenburgh comments?

@waxlamp waxlamp self-assigned this Sep 10, 2024
@aaronkanzer
Copy link
Member Author

Just re-visiting now -- sorry for the delay, thank you @mvandenburgh @waxlamp and @yarikoptic for the review.

I think I'm going to close this PR and not move forward to move (I'll just resort to using this as a local utility). I'd rather not make it a configurable script that is merged (seems like an increase in cognitive overhead if this is not unanimously wanted by other folks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants