Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Partial fix for the negative virtual static method tests #17

Conversation

trylek
Copy link
Collaborator

@trylek trylek commented May 11, 2021

  1. UnimplementedAbstractMethodOnConcreteClass - I have added logic
    to verify that all SVMs are implemented once a class is fully loaded.
    That required me to propagate a new flag around limiting the class
    load level for methods, otherwise we were hitting stack overflows
    in many of the tests. I have recycled a pre-existing HRESULT ID which
    is probably not what we want, I just didn't want to churn the codebase
    before hearing from you what is the right way to proceed here.

  2. UnimplementedAbstractMethodOnAbstractClass - the one remaining
    failing case is 'ConstraintCheckShouldFail' - I guess that corresponds
    to what you alluded to in mentioning that we're not properly checking
    class constraints yet.

  3. MultipleMethodImplRecordsSameMethodDecl - I added an extra parameter
    to the SVM resolution logic that traverses all the MethodImpls and
    throws when hitting a duplicate.

The remaining failures involve the following negative tests:

InterfaceVariance (pending my offline feedback)
VarianceSafety (pending my offline feedback)
UnimplementedAbstractMethodOnAbstractClass / ConstraintCheckShouldFail

Thanks

Tomas

@trylek trylek requested a review from davidwrighton May 11, 2021 00:20
@trylek trylek changed the title Partial fix for the negative virtual static methods Partial fix for the negative virtual static method tests May 11, 2021
for (MethodIterator it(pInterfaceMT); it.IsValid(); it.Next())
{
MethodDesc *pMD = it.GetMethodDesc();
if (!ResolveVirtualStaticMethod(pInterfaceMT, pMD, /* allowNullResult */ TRUE, /* checkDuplicates */ TRUE))
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I should probably add some checks here to just check the SVMs, will do in the next iteration along with your PR feedback.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In fact, is that something we should add to the negative tests, like some test that defines a (non-virtual) static method on an interface and verifies that the method doesn't need to be overridden in a class that implements the interface? I'm not really sure, it sounds quite artificial. On the positive side, should we just check that pMD is static and virtual as a pre-requisite to running the ResolveVirtualStaticMethod check?

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about just check for pMD being static and virtual, and that's probably enough for here.

You're right though, the current testbed doesn't add instance methods to any of the static interfaces, and this would likely break if that wasn't done. I'm kinda hoping to write that sort of test in C#, as it will be far easier to do.

if (!ResolveVirtualStaticMethod(pInterfaceMT, pMD, /* allowNullResult */ TRUE, /* checkDuplicates */ TRUE))
{
IMDInternalImport* pInternalImport = GetModule()->GetMDImport();
GetModule()->GetAssembly()->ThrowTypeLoadException(pInternalImport, GetCl(), pMD->GetName(), IDS_CLASSLOAD_STATICVIRTUAL);
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the ID I recycled - it basically shows all the information that's needed but its wording is misleading as it complains about the method being static virtual instead of missing implementation.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix before checkin, but yes new string ids are annoying.

Copy link
Owner

@davidwrighton davidwrighton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks generally good. I only had a few comments.

for (MethodIterator it(pInterfaceMT); it.IsValid(); it.Next())
{
MethodDesc *pMD = it.GetMethodDesc();
if (!ResolveVirtualStaticMethod(pInterfaceMT, pMD, /* allowNullResult */ TRUE, /* checkDuplicates */ TRUE))
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea.

if (!ResolveVirtualStaticMethod(pInterfaceMT, pMD, /* allowNullResult */ TRUE, /* checkDuplicates */ TRUE))
{
IMDInternalImport* pInternalImport = GetModule()->GetMDImport();
GetModule()->GetAssembly()->ThrowTypeLoadException(pInternalImport, GetCl(), pMD->GetName(), IDS_CLASSLOAD_STATICVIRTUAL);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix before checkin, but yes new string ids are annoying.

@@ -5659,6 +5659,11 @@ void MethodTable::DoFullyLoad(Generics::RecursionGraph * const pVisited, const
}
else
{
if (HasVirtualStaticMethods() && !IsAbstract() && !IsSharedByGenericInstantiations())
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This deserves at least a TODO describing how to avoid doing this work for anything in System.Private.CoreLib. Maintaining this work as a pay-for-play feature requires that we are very careful making any changes in this part of the system.

@davidwrighton
Copy link
Owner

@trylek, I have a pair of PR's that address the variance concerns.

@trylek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

trylek commented May 11, 2021

Thanks David for the update. I believe I have addressed all your PR feedback so please take another look when you have a chance.

@davidwrighton
Copy link
Owner

Please add the check for static and virtual as requested above, and fix the merge conflict.

1) UnimplementedAbstractMethodOnConcreteClass - I have added logic
to verify that all SVMs are implemented once a class is fully loaded.
That required me to propagate a new flag around limiting the class
load level for methods, otherwise we were hitting stack overflows
in many of the tests. I have recycled a pre-existing HRESULT ID which
is probably not what we want, I just didn't want to churn the codebase
before hearing from you what is the right way to proceed here.

2) UnimplementedAbstractMethodOnAbstractClass - the one remaining
failing case is 'ConstraintCheckShouldFail' - I guess that corresponds
to what you alluded to in mentioning that we're not properly checking
class constraints yet.

3) MultipleMethodImplRecordsSameMethodDecl - I added an extra parameter
to the SVM resolution logic that traverses all the MethodImpls and
throws when hitting a duplicate.

The remaining failures involve the following negative tests:

InterfaceVariance (pending my offline feedback)
VarianceSafety (pending my offline feedback)
UnimplementedAbstractMethodOnAbstractClass / ConstraintCheckShouldFail

Thanks

Tomas
@davidwrighton davidwrighton merged commit 5a8a973 into davidwrighton:feature/staticvirtualinterfaces May 12, 2021
davidwrighton pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
…tnet#52769)

Transition to GC Unsafe mode on every MONO_RT_EXTERNAL_ONLY function in
reflection.c

In particular, fix mono_reflection_type_from_name which is used in
https://github.com/xamarin/xamarin-android/blob/681887ebdbd192ce7ce1cd02221d4939599ba762/src/monodroid/jni/embedded-assemblies.cc#L350

Fixes stack traces like

```
05-14 08:06:12.848 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #00 pc 00000b99  [vdso] (__kernel_vsyscall+9)
05-14 08:06:12.848 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #1 pc 0005ad68  /apex/com.android.runtime/lib/bionic/libc.so (syscall+40) (BuildId: 6e3a0180fa6637b68c0d181c343e6806)
05-14 08:06:12.848 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #2 pc 00076511  /apex/com.android.runtime/lib/bionic/libc.so (abort+209) (BuildId: 6e3a0180fa6637b68c0d181c343e6806)
05-14 08:06:12.848 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #3 pc 0002afcd  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonodroid.so (xamarin::android::internal::MonodroidRuntime::mono_log_handler(char const*, char const*, char const*, int, void*)+141) (BuildId: 9726f32ad5f8fa5e7c5762baf2f6e3294da41cc1)
05-14 08:06:12.848 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #4 pc 00112c5d  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (eglib_log_adapter+141) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #5 pc 00020fdf  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (monoeg_g_logv+175) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #6 pc 0002113a  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (monoeg_g_log+42) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #7 pc 00128892  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_threads_transition_do_blocking+258) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #8 pc 0012a406  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_threads_enter_gc_safe_region_unbalanced_with_info+134) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #9 pc 0012a27e  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_threads_enter_gc_safe_region_internal+46) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #10 pc 000799a7  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_loader_lock+71) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #11 pc 000447a1  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_class_create_from_typedef+129) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #12 pc 0003c073  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_class_get_checked+99) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #13 pc 0003cc0f  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_class_from_name_checked_aux+735) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #14 pc 00037989  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_class_from_name_checked+73) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #15 pc 000cc5f4  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_reflection_get_type_internal+132) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #16 pc 000c9bce  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_reflection_get_type_with_rootimage+126) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #17 pc 000ca204  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (_mono_reflection_get_type_from_info+292) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #18 pc 000ca06e  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_reflection_type_from_name_checked+334) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #19 pc 000c9f01  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonosgen-2.0.so (mono_reflection_type_from_name+49) (BuildId: b67e93dd750dafdd6f65f408b021b6a3a74868ac)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #20 pc 0001b40b  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonodroid.so (xamarin::android::internal::EmbeddedAssemblies::typemap_java_to_managed(char const*)+427) (BuildId: 9726f32ad5f8fa5e7c5762baf2f6e3294da41cc1)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #21 pc 0001b551  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonodroid.so (xamarin::android::internal::EmbeddedAssemblies::typemap_java_to_managed(_MonoString*)+113) (BuildId: 9726f32ad5f8fa5e7c5762baf2f6e3294da41cc1)
05-14 08:06:12.849 31274 31274 F DEBUG   :       #22 pc 000211a7  /data/app/~~rMrkpKmVPaBpM5jKb8fPAg==/com.microsoft.maui-JfRo8RWSDJaNtJuBa0y7_Q==/lib/x86/libmonodroid.so (xamarin::android::internal::MonodroidRuntime::typemap_java_to_managed(_MonoString*)+39) (BuildId: 9726f32ad5f8fa5e7c5762baf2f6e3294da41cc1)
```
@trylek trylek deleted the MethodImplChecks branch January 10, 2022 19:40
davidwrighton pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
* Initial implementation for contract customization

fix build errors

Move converter rooting to DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver so that it can be used standalone

Fix ConfigurationList.IsReadOnly

Minor refactorings (#1)

* Makes the following changes:

* Move singleton initialization for DefaultTypeInfoResolver behind a static property.
* Consolidate JsonSerializerContext & IJsonTypeInfoResolver values to a single field.
* Move reflection fallback logic away from JsonSerializerContext and into JsonSerializerOptions

* Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonSerializerOptions.cs

* remove testing of removed field

Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation (#2)

* Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation

* Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs

* Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs

Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <mordotymoja@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <mordotymoja@gmail.com>

Tests and fixes for JsonTypeInfoKind.None

TypeInfo type mismatch tests

Allow setting NumberHandling on JsonTypeInfoKind.None

test resolver returning wrong type of options

JsonTypeInfo/JsonPropertyInfo mutability tests

rename test file

Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver (#3)

* Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver

* address feedback

Add simple test for using JsonTypeInfo<T> with APIs directly taking it

fix and tests for untyped/typed CreateObject

uncomment test cases, remove todo

More tests and tiny fixes

Add a JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine test for JsonSerializerContext (#4)

* Fix JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine for JsonSerializerContext

* Break up failing test

Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts (#6)

* Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts

* feedback

JsonSerializerContext combine test with different camel casing

Remove unneeded virtual calls & branching when accessing Get & Set delegates (#7)

JsonPropertyInfo tests everything minus ShouldSerialize & NumberHandling

Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs

Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs

throw InvalidOperationException rather than ArgumentNullException for source gen when PropertyInfo.Name is assigned through JsonPropertyInfoValues

tests for duplicated property names and JsonPropertyInfo.NumberHandling

Add tests for NumberHandling and failing tests for ShouldSerialize

disable the failing test and add extra checks

disable remainder of the failing ShouldSerialize tests, fix working one

Fix ShouldSerialize and IgnoreCondition interop

Add failing tests for CreateObject + parametrized constructors

Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types (#10)

* Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types

* address feedback

Make contexts more combinator friendly (#9)

* Make contexts more combinator friendly

* remove converter cache

* redesign test to account for JsonConstructorAttribute

* Combine unit tests

* address feedback

* Add acceptance tests for DataContract attributes & Specified pattern (#11)

* Add private field serialization acceptance test (#13)

* tests, PR feedback (#14)

* PR feedback and extra tests

* Shorten class name, remove incorrect check (not true for polimorphic cases)

* Make parameter matching for custom properties map property Name with parameter (#16)

* Test static initialization with JsonTypeInfo (#17)

* Fix test failures and proper fix this time (#18)

* Fix test failures and proper fix this time

* reinstate ActiveIssueAttribute

* PR feedback and adjust couple of tests which don't set TypeInfoResolver

* fix IAsyncEnumerable tests

* Lock JsonSerializerOptions in JsonTypeInfo.EnsureConfigured()

Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants