-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: move redirect test server to rust #6364
Conversation
8dcfa78
to
0aa77d7
Compare
6752a57
to
4ecf10a
Compare
f18e9a6
to
47d117c
Compare
failures: std_tests type_directives_redirect x_deno_warning
@ry I'm giving up on fixing the benchmarks - I have no idea what is happening here and why (it seems that) every benchmark starts a dozen servers. I'm no longer surprised that CI is red anyway, this is a mess. Feel free of course to roll back all the non-fixes I've pushed. |
0b1649c
to
08d4175
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, minus one nitpick below
[[package]] | ||
name = "tokio-rustls" | ||
version = "0.13.1" | ||
source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index" | ||
checksum = "15cb62a0d2770787abc96e99c1cd98fcf17f94959f3af63ca85bdfb203f051b4" | ||
dependencies = [ | ||
"futures-core", | ||
"rustls", | ||
"rustls 0.17.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it means we got two different versions of tokio-rustls
and rustls
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I found that weird too but there does not seem to be an easy workaround.
IIRC (from last night) reqwest requires the latest version of tokio-rustls, and warp is a little behind in updating it's dependencies...
self.test_server.kill().expect("failed to kill test_server"); | ||
let _ = self.test_server.wait(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 good to know
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, ship it!
No description provided.