type existing prs in the job definition

[jakecoffman]

What are you trying to accomplish?

• See make Job parse all Hashes into class instances immediately #9561

Replaces an Array of Hashes with an actual class! This prevents typos and makes Sorbet more useful.

Anything you want to highlight for special attention from reviewers?

One challenge here was we use a mini-version of Dependency. So I didn't want to reuse the Dependency class as the comparison is kind of special, so I made an inner-class Dependency under Pull Request. Is that confusing? Should it have a different name?

How will you know you've accomplished your goal?

This change should have no functional difference, so as long as the type checking and tests are passing, and no new errors popup after deployment we should be good.

Checklist

• I have run the complete test suite to ensure all tests and linters pass.
• I have thoroughly tested my code changes to ensure they work as expected, including adding additional tests for new functionality.
• I have written clear and descriptive commit messages.
• I have provided a detailed description of the changes in the pull request, including the problem it addresses, how it fixes the problem, and any relevant details about the implementation.
• I have ensured that the code is well-documented and easy to understand.

[jakecoffman]

I think I may have just fixed a bug with 3079ac2. When checking to see if we already created a PR we should also consider PRs created by this very job.

The NuGet smoke tests used to be

created | AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Rabbitmq ( from 5.0.2 to 7.0.0 ), Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks ( from 5.0.17... |
created | Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks ( from 5.0.17 to 7.0.9 )                                                   |

but now it skips the second PR because it was already bumped in the first PR.

[abdulapopoola]

Thanks for helping us to make the code better!