Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mono] Fix swizzle_mask type #107460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

radekdoulik
Copy link
Member

That was catched by llvm debug asserts, the mask should be vector of 16x 1 byte integers

That was catched by llvm debug asserts, the mask should be vector of 16 int8
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @lambdageek, @steveisok
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member

Should we backport this? Do you know if the release LLVM generates bad code if the swizzle mask has the wrong type?

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 6, 2024

Should we backport this? Do you know if the release LLVM generates bad code if the swizzle mask has the wrong type?

I think we should probably backport all these llvm fixes to at least 9.0

@lewing lewing merged commit dc5dbab into dotnet:main Sep 6, 2024
79 of 81 checks passed
@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 10, 2024

/backport release/9.0

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member

/backport to release/9.0

Copy link
Contributor

Started backporting to release/9.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/10791615676

jtschuster pushed a commit to jtschuster/runtime that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
That was catched by llvm debug asserts, the mask should be vector of 16 int8
sirntar pushed a commit to sirntar/runtime that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
That was catched by llvm debug asserts, the mask should be vector of 16 int8
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants